Captain Koloth said:Nope, and only a yIntagh repeats the dishonorable insults of a taHqeq
towards a Klingon!
Captain said:Nearly all of it, given it's rarely custom-subclasses.
[calls me a liar]
It makes sense
VeQ!
Tom Anderson said, and Captain Koloth forgot
I have already shown how it isn't necessarily a "little change".
You should do something about that phlegm. Why are you spouting
random nonsense amidst your comments?
You have completely disregarded the points made before
[suggests that I might have been dishonest]
unlikely for such a subclass to be overriding the superclass
implementation of keySet.
[suggests that I might have been dishonest]
You've never worked on a large-scale project, have you?
I know from the jobs on which I work that
these are real concerns, as voiced by the software architects and
project managers, that affect how real budgets are spent, and
it's founded on real-world experience, unlike what you've been saying.
And speak English, not gobbledygook.
[calls me a liar]
[insults deleted], Paul.
More nonsense.
If anyone here is a lying petaQ ... well, let's just say that it is
not I!
[insults deleted]
Paul averred:
"Probably"? "Only a handful"? [more false accusations of
dishonesty]
You seem to think that you've said something real, here.
Anyway, your complete unwillingness to engage in a real dialog
And quit the dishonesty
Captain said:But we only need to worry about the side on the receiving end of the
changes. We can assume the side that WANTS the change is fine with it.
Captain said:You certainly can if you're just adding firstKey, lastKey, tailSet,
headSet, and subSet to a Set on which you aren't currently even
calling those methods.
A few. And how many already return a SortedSet, just without the
return type being declared as such? Those can be subtracted. The only
change they need is to change the return type! A one minute change!
Those maintaining Java specs has to consider both sides.
the ones writing classes that implement the interface does
not necessarily want the change.
Captain said:More tu'HomIraH insults! You dishonor this place with your very
presence, petaQ.
BIjatlh 'e' yImev, you dishonorable Romulan taHqeq! I did no such
thing. You are the one who's been mangling attributions.
YIDoghQo'. I have already shown that you were wrong.
YIntagh petaQ! You dare call the Klingon language "nonsense"? You
would be wise to stay away from Qo'noS. You would not utter three
words there before someone ran you through with a bat'leth! Hab SoSlI'
Quch!
BIjatlh 'e' yImev, petaQ!
None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at
all true.
[suggests that I might have been dishonest]
YIHarQo'! nepwI' ghaH!
PetaQ! Qab jIH naghIl! (Face me if you dare!) Otherwise, naDevvo'
yIghoS.
Of course I have, Romulan slime. Why do you ask?
... veQ.
Lew:
Paul:
Romulan cur! Again, you dare to accuse me of lying? QoH! Charghbej
vIt!
Nuqjatlh??
Gobbledygook??!
TlhIngan maH!
I speak the language of honor, while you speak like a Federation
petaQ!
My name is Koloth, petaQ!
Qab jIH naghIl, cowardly taHqeq! BItu Hpa' bIHeghjaja!
Lew:Paul:More nonsense.
I said, "when you insult a Klingon's honor, prepare for trouble". You
did not heed the warning, yIntagh. Bljeghbe'chug vaj blHegh, petaQ!QI'yaH!
No, he did not. I wrote that, you dishonorable Romulan taHqeq.
"Probably"? "Only a handful"? [more false accusations of
dishonesty]
The only dishonorable one here is you, petaQ. You are a coward who
hides behind a computer screen and insults the honor of true warriors!
Do'Ha'! But, I suppose, rot yittmey ghom Hoch ...
To all jaghpu' who dare dishonor me in public, I have only this to
say: charghbej vIt!
Oh, and toDwI'maj qoSyItIvqu'!
A few. And how many already return a SortedSet, just without the
return type being declared as such? Those can be subtracted. The only
change they need is to change the return type! A one minute change!
[implied insults deleted]
Captain said:Nope, and only a yIntagh repeats the dishonorable insults of a taHqeq
towards a Klingon!
When we're talking about modifying a class in java.util, "those
maintaining Java specs" ARE one side!
Fortunately it is a trivial change.
YIntagh petaQ! You dare call the Klingon language "nonsense"? You
[insult deleted]
A dead giveaway.
[suggests that I might have been dishonest]
[calls me a liar]
Of course I have, Romulan slime. Why do you ask?
Because you [insult deleted]
I take it back. [implied insult deleted]
Paul:
Romulan cur! Again, you dare to accuse me of lying? QoH! Charghbej
vIt!
[numerous vicious insults deleted]
Paul:
"Probably"? "Only a handful"? [more false accusations of
dishonesty]
[insult deleted]
The only dishonorable one here is you, petaQ. You are a coward who
hides behind a computer screen and insults the honor of true warriors!
Do'Ha'! But, I suppose, rot yittmey ghom Hoch ...
[implied insult deleted]
To all jaghpu' who dare dishonor me in public, I have only this to
say: charghbej vIt!Oh, and toDwI'maj qoSyItIvqu'!
[implied insult deleted]
**** you.
Captain said:Nope, and only a yIntagh repeats the dishonorable insults of a taHqeq
towards a Klingon!
[insults deleted], Paul
[snip](e-mail address removed) wrote:
Paul, Paul, Paul.
When will you learn that [vicious insults deleted]
[insult deleted]
[email protected] said:**** you.
[insult deleted]
Lew said:Syllogism:
Klingons are fictional creatures.
You are not fictional.
Therefore, you are not a Klingon.
It's called logic, Paul.
Lew said:Paul, Paul, Paul. When will you learn that your stupid aliases don't work?
Lew said:Oooh! Aren't we the mature, stable one?
[insults deleted], PaulCaptain said:Nope, and only a yIntagh repeats the dishonorable insults of a taHqeq
towards a Klingon!
My name is Jerry.
[snip](e-mail address removed) wrote:
DO NOT POST IMMEDIATELY AFTER I DO, CYBER-STALKER. WAIT A DECENT
INTERVAL FIRST.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.