onload without onunload being executed...

[Mel]

i would like to ignore onUnload action when the user reloads the page !!
what can i do ?

pleeeez help muai

 

[DB McGee]

i would like to ignore onUnload action when the user reloads the page !!
what can i do ?

pleeeez help muai

Set the onunload event handler to return false.

 

[Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn]

i would like to ignore onUnload action when the user reloads the page !!
what can i do ?
Nothing.

pleeeez help muai

[x] done
[x] your keyboard is borken


PointedEars

 

[Randy Webb]

Mel wrote:

i would like to ignore onUnload action when the user reloads the page !!
what can i do ?

Nothing.


pleeeez help muai

[x] done
[x] your keyboard is borken

Are you truly as stupid as you act?

P.S. I *can* stop onload when the page is reloaded. Perhaps if you knew
as much javascript as you portray yourself as knowing then you would
know how to accomplish it as well.

P.S.S. The idea is not to stop the onload, but to use the onload in a
way that the OP has not even thought about.

 

[Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn]

<language mode="speaker" reverb="airport">

Randy Webb <[email protected]>, currently online with a news
client in comp.lang.javascript, is requested not to post followups
to the postings of Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <[email protected]>.
They are not even downloaded by the latter netizen and are thus
merely a waste of precious bandwidth which could instead be of
good use for later generations.

Thank you for your attention and for obeying all rules of security.

</language>


PointedEars, X&F'up2 where it belongs to

 

[Dr John Stockton]

JRS: In article <[email protected]>, seen in
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn

<language mode="speaker" reverb="airport">

Randy Webb <[email protected]>, currently online with a news
client in comp.lang.javascript, is requested not to post followups
to the postings of Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <[email protected]>.
They are not even downloaded by the latter netizen and are thus
merely a waste of precious bandwidth which could instead be of
good use for later generations.

Thank you for your attention and for obeying all rules of security.

</language>


PointedEars, X&F'up2 where it belongs to

It seems that a significant proportion of the regulars here consider you
to be both arrogant and stupid (albeit not without technical knowledge;
but others have that too).

If you cannot deal with those two personal problems, or at least conceal
them, the best remedy would be for you not to post here.

As a more detailed comment on what you wrote above :

It seems that you do not understand that this is a public discussion
medium. Responses, even where specifically aimed at helping an original
questioner, are for all to read and comment on. It is a great merit of
News that in it, unlike in the Web, incorrect information is extremely
likely to be pointed out, where those who have read it can see the
correction, within a day or two.

The correction of pig-headed responses benefits their readers; and,
occasionally, their authors.

==

Bandwidth cannot be conserved for the future; spectral availability
should be.