D
david graham
http://www.turnip.clara.co.uk/jvaughan_cv_sysadmin.html
Hi
I think I should have posted this in c.i.w.a.s but this group are as strong
(if not stronger) than the more specialist group. Anyway, we all know that
IE (any version, at least for PC, don't know about IE5 Mac?) does not
implement position: fixed on anything other than background-attachment:
fixed, so how does this guys CV get round that problem. His CV works really
well in all browsers I have tested it in (NN7, Opera7.1, IE5). All I see in
the source is:
div.navbar {
position: fixed;
width: 25%;
height: 100%;
left: 0px;
top: 0px;
padding-left: 0px;
font-family: "Times New Roman", Times, Georgia, serif;
background: #f5f5f5;
}
no sign of any hack there!
BTW - I think it is worth studying how he has used CSS - I think it is a
high standard, is that a correct assessment?
I like the way he has seperated out CSS for compliant browsers from that
intended for older browsers.
thanks
David
Hi
I think I should have posted this in c.i.w.a.s but this group are as strong
(if not stronger) than the more specialist group. Anyway, we all know that
IE (any version, at least for PC, don't know about IE5 Mac?) does not
implement position: fixed on anything other than background-attachment:
fixed, so how does this guys CV get round that problem. His CV works really
well in all browsers I have tested it in (NN7, Opera7.1, IE5). All I see in
the source is:
div.navbar {
position: fixed;
width: 25%;
height: 100%;
left: 0px;
top: 0px;
padding-left: 0px;
font-family: "Times New Roman", Times, Georgia, serif;
background: #f5f5f5;
}
no sign of any hack there!
BTW - I think it is worth studying how he has used CSS - I think it is a
high standard, is that a correct assessment?
I like the way he has seperated out CSS for compliant browsers from that
intended for older browsers.
thanks
David