D
David Kerber
All versions of NetBeans are free.
Ok, thanks. Somehow I had it in my mind that they had both free and
non-free versions.
All versions of NetBeans are free.
[email protected] said:[0] "Othello" is the better-known name for that game.
David said:Ok, thanks. Somehow I had it in my mind that they had both free and
non-free versions.
David said:BillJosephson wrote:
Hi, I want to write a program in Java or C++
IR wrote:
I forgot to mention Eclipse for Java development (which is free also).
Incidentally, you could also use it's [sic] CDT plugin for C++ development.
There are many IDEs (integrated development environments) available for Java
development, and few not-so-I DEs like emacs, many of which are free. Java
itself is free ("as in beer").
GIYF.
- Lew
Yeah, I looked at this a while back. I like the sound of jEdit but
never could figure out how to get it configured like an IDE, with
debugger window and a way to watch variables, etc. There just doesn't
seem to be much approachable documentation.
Would you recommend an IDE that sort of looke like Visual IDEs or
Codewarrior? With an editor window, a debugger with conditional
breakpoints, a way to watch varibles, an output window....all at the
same time?
Eclipse. If you only need java support, you could also look at the free
version of NetBeans.
Hi, I want to write a program in Java or C++, and just discovered on my
bookshelve Codewarrior 7. It says Windows 95, 98, NT, 2000, ME. Can I
develop a command line application that will work on my XT machine? A
grahpical interface?
Thanks. I tried netbeans but it looked like it was going to take some
work to get a handle on. For one, I didn't see how to set it up with
variable watch window, code window....I imagine it can do it and I
should take the time to check into it, since after all it does come
free with java.
Is Eclipse free?
David said:Yes, from www.eclipse.org. I found it a bit less intuitive than
netbeans, with a somewhat (though not dramatically) steeper learning
curve, but it is also more versatile, since it can work with other
languages than just java.
A long time ago SUN sold a modified NetBeans as Forte for Java.
Greymaus said:Starting with version 5.5, Netbeans has a C++ plugin, available free
from the Netbeans website.
Lew said:For gcc C/ C++, I have found nothing I like better than emacs, make and gdb.
emacs has wonderful integration for these tools.
For Java I prefer Netbeans. I also use Eclipse and WebSphere Application
Developer, also emacs + Ant. I have used a handful of others.
- Lew
Lew, do you do much graphical interfacd development? I've used emacs,
and I wonder if it has tools like graphical interface development tools
these days. Also, how does it do in integrating with APIs (I mean
toolboxes that work with a parcitular OS)?
Lew said:(e-mail address removed) says...
Which was not called NetBeans.
Lew said:I am not using emacs for heavy development these days because Netbeans is
stronger for Java. When I used emacs for C++ I did not miss GUI wizards, I
just programmed from the source text and did many compile/run cycles to test
the output. I would also write a GUI-only facade and test it, then inherit
that to fill in the logic (sort of a "poor-man's MVC" before I was familiar
with the MVC pattern).
To step back, your question has me re-evaluate my position. I still use emacs
for small, quick steps, but I think by now I am addicted to IDEs for major
sessions of work.
- Lew
Lew said:(e-mail address removed) says...
Which was not called NetBeans.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.