Python 3.2 is excellent, but

Discussion in 'Python' started by jmfauth, Mar 1, 2011.

  1. jmfauth

    jmfauth Guest

    Well, Python (as 3.2) has never reached this level of excellence, but
    __pycache__, no, not for me.

    (I feel better now, after I wrote it.)
     
    jmfauth, Mar 1, 2011
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. jmfauth, 01.03.2011 11:40:
    > __pycache__, no, not for me.


    This has been discussed before. The 'argument' you presented is usually due
    to a misunderstanding of how __pycache__ works. Consider reading the PEP.

    Stefan
     
    Stefan Behnel, Mar 1, 2011
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. jmfauth

    Tom Zych Guest

    jmfauth wrote:
    > Well, Python (as 3.2) has never reached this level of excellence, but
    > __pycache__, no, not for me.
    >
    > (I feel better now, after I wrote it.)


    Could you be more specific? :)

    --
    Tom Zych /
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
     
    Tom Zych, Mar 1, 2011
    #3
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Replies:
    0
    Views:
    3,503
  2. Replies:
    1
    Views:
    721
    Juan T. Llibre
    Jan 21, 2005
  3. Replies:
    0
    Views:
    617
  4. David Boncasio

    Excellent eBook for UML JAVA

    David Boncasio, Nov 4, 2004, in forum: Java
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    488
    Sudsy
    Nov 4, 2004
  5. Wade Leftwich

    Excellent sci-fi novel featuring Python

    Wade Leftwich, Nov 17, 2007, in forum: Python
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    323
    Simon Brunning
    Nov 17, 2007
Loading...

Share This Page