Python 3.2 is excellent, but

[jmfauth]

Well, Python (as 3.2) has never reached this level of excellence, but
__pycache__, no, not for me.

(I feel better now, after I wrote it.)

 

[Stefan Behnel]

jmfauth, 01.03.2011 11:40:

__pycache__, no, not for me.

This has been discussed before. The 'argument' you presented is usually due
to a misunderstanding of how __pycache__ works. Consider reading the PEP.

Stefan

 

[Tom Zych]

Well, Python (as 3.2) has never reached this level of excellence, but
__pycache__, no, not for me.

(I feel better now, after I wrote it.)

Could you be more specific?