Quality of the photos on the website

[Luigi Donatello Asero]

Well, there are about 600 pictures on the website
http://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com
What about the photo on this page for example?
http://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv/muranoglasett.html



--
Luigi ( un italiano che vive in Svezia)


http://www.italymap.dk
http://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv/elba.html

 

[brucie]

in post: <

http://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv/muranoglasett.html

the image is 308x480px not 193x300px you claim it is in your html.

don't use html to resize images, browsers do a really crap job at it and
it wastes time/bandwidth/money downloading images that are larger than
required. with a very few exceptions images should only be displayed at
their actual size.

 

[Luigi Donatello Asero]

in post: <

the image is 308x480px not 193x300px you claim it is in your html.

don't use html to resize images, browsers do a really crap job at it and
it wastes time/bandwidth/money downloading images that are larger than
required. with a very few exceptions images should only be displayed at
their actual size.

Would you be so kind as to explain further?
If I click by the mouse on the photo I see 193x300px

--
Luigi ( un italiano che vive in Svezia)


http://www.italymap.dk
http://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv/elba.html

 

[brucie]

in post: <

Would you be so kind as to explain further?
If I click by the mouse on the photo I see 193x300px

your html says:

<IMG ... bicchiereunogrande.JPG" WIDTH="193" HEIGHT="300" ...>

which is not the case:
http://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/bilder/bicchiereunogrande.JPG

 

[Steve Pugh]

Would you be so kind as to explain further?
If I click by the mouse on the photo I see 193x300px

The image in that page is
http://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/bilder/bicchiereunogrande.JPG
and is 308x480. That's the image that is downloaded every time someone
views that page.

The browser then squeezes the image down to 193x300 when it displays
it. As browsers are not fully featured graphics programs they do not
as good a job at preserving the quality of the image when they reduce
the size as you could do if you did it yourself beforehand.

By resizing the image in a graphics program to 193x300 you can make it
smaller, thus making the page quicker to download, lowering your
bandwidth costs, etc.

Steve

 

[Luigi Donatello Asero]

your html says:

<IMG ... bicchiereunogrande.JPG" WIDTH="193" HEIGHT="300" ...>

which is not the case:
http://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/bilder/bicchiereunogrande.JPG

Thank you.
So, this one http://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/it/ceramicasvedesedue.html
for example is correct isn´t it?




--
Luigi ( un italiano che vive in Svezia)


http://www.italymap.dk
http://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv/elba.html

 

[brucie]

in post: <

So, this one http://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/it/ceramicasvedesedue.html
for example is correct isn´t it?

i'm sure you have the intelligence to work out if it is or not by
yourself.

 

[Alan D-W]

Well, there are about 600 pictures on the website
http://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com
What about the photo on this page for example?
http://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/sv/muranoglasett.html

Yours: 11981 bytes.
PhotoShop:
resize to 193x301
Save for web @ Q=9
Result: 4720 bytes
Hardly any visible difference.

My 2p
Alan