Question about usage of pointer in trees, linked list (The double indirection)

W

william

When implementing Linked list, stack, or trees, we always use pointers
to 'link' the nodes.
And every node is always defined as:
struct node
{
type data; //data this node contains
...
node * nPtr; //the next node's pointer
}

And we also define operations as insert, delete, etc. on the data
structure.
MY QUESTION IS:
why we always pass node**(pointer to the pointer to the node) as
argument to these operations? Why we can not just use the node *?

Thank you!

Ji
 
J

John Harrison

william said:
When implementing Linked list, stack, or trees, we always use pointers
to 'link' the nodes.
And every node is always defined as:
struct node
{
type data; //data this node contains
...
node * nPtr; //the next node's pointer
}

And we also define operations as insert, delete, etc. on the data
structure.
MY QUESTION IS:
why we always pass node**(pointer to the pointer to the node) as
argument to these operations? Why we can not just use the node *?

Thank you!

Ji

In a good implementation of a linked list, the nodes are completely
hidden. You would never pass node* or node** to any operations.

What you are looking at is a bad implementation of a linked list. I
can't tell you why it uses node** or node* without seeing the code. It
shouldn't use either.

john
 
I

Ian Collins

william said:
When implementing Linked list, stack, or trees, we always use pointers
to 'link' the nodes.
And every node is always defined as:
struct node
{
type data; //data this node contains
...
node * nPtr; //the next node's pointer
}

And we also define operations as insert, delete, etc. on the data
structure.
MY QUESTION IS:
why we always pass node**(pointer to the pointer to the node) as
argument to these operations? Why we can not just use the node *?
So the value of the pointer can be changed, as well as the value the
pointer point to.
 
W

william

In a good implementation of a linked list, the nodes are completely
hidden. You would never pass node* or node** to any operations.

What does it mean by nodes are completely hidden(as being refered to,
nodes means the pointers to the actual struct block in memory, or the
structs themselves?)
What you are looking at is a bad implementation of a linked list. I
can't tell you why it uses node** or node* without seeing the code. It
shouldn't use either.

john

I paste the sample code below, which came from the book 'C how to
program'. John, could you please offer me a good example of
implementation of linked list? Thank you.

**********************************************************************
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

struct listNode
{
char data;
struct listNode *nextPtr;
};

typedef struct listNode ListNode;
typedef ListNode *ListNodePtr;

void insert(ListNodePtr *, char);
char delete(ListNodePtr *, char);
int isEmpty(ListNodePtr);
void printList(ListNodePtr);
void instructions(void);

int main()
{
ListNodePtr startPtr=NULL;
int choice;
char item;

instructions(); //display the menu;
printf(">");
scanf("%d",&choice);

while(choice!=3)
{
switch (choice)
{
case 1:
printf("Enter a character: ");
scanf("\n%c",&item);
insert(&startPtr,item);
printList(startPtr);
break;

case 2:
if(!isEmpty(startPtr))
{
printf("Enter character to be deleted: ");
scanf("\n%c",&item);

if(delete(&startPtr,item))
{
printf("%c deleted.\n",item);
printList(startPtr);
}
else
printf("%c not found.\n\n",item);
}
else
printf("List is empty.\n\n");
break;
default:
printf("Invalid choice.\n\n");
instructions();
break;
}
printf(">");
scanf("%d",&choice);
}
printf("End of run.\n");
return 0;
}

void instructions(void)
{
printf("Enter your choice:\n");
printf("1 to insert an element into the list.\n"
"2 to delete an element from the list.\n"
"3 to exit the program.\n");
}

void insert(ListNodePtr *sPtr, char value)
{
ListNodePtr newPtr, previousPtr, currentPtr;

newPtr=malloc(sizeof(ListNode));
if(newPtr !=NULL)
{
newPtr->data=value;
newPtr->nextPtr=NULL;

//set the searching index(previousPtr and
//currentPtr)to the start of the list.
previousPtr=NULL;
currentPtr=*sPtr;

while(currentPtr !=NULL && value>currentPtr->data)
{
previousPtr=currentPtr;
currentPtr=currentPtr->nextPtr;
} //keep going

if(previousPtr==NULL)
{
newPtr->nextPtr=*sPtr;
*sPtr=newPtr;//insert the node at the beginning of the list
}
else
{
previousPtr->nextPtr=newPtr;
newPtr->nextPtr=currentPtr;
}
}
else
{
printf("%c not inserted. No memory available.\n",value);
}
}

char delete(ListNodePtr *sPtr, char value)
{
ListNodePtr previousPtr,currentPtr,tempPtr;

if (value==(*sPtr)->data)
{
tempPtr=*sPtr;
*sPtr=(*sPtr)->nextPtr;
free(tempPtr);
return value;
}
else
{
previousPtr=*sPtr;
currentPtr=(*sPtr)->nextPtr;//setup the cursor at the beginning

//when the cursor didn't reach the tail and cursor didn't find the
//specified value, the cursor keep going along the list
while(currentPtr !=NULL && currentPtr->data !=value)
{
previousPtr=currentPtr;
currentPtr=currentPtr->nextPtr;//move on to next node
}

if(currentPtr !=NULL)//if not reaching the tail
{
tempPtr=currentPtr;
previousPtr->nextPtr=currentPtr->nextPtr;
free(tempPtr);
return value;
}
}
return '\0';//return null char;
}

int isEmpty(ListNodePtr sPtr)
{
return sPtr==NULL;
}

void printList(ListNodePtr currentPtr)
{
if(currentPtr==NULL)
{
printf("List is Empty.\n\n");
}
else
{
printf("The list is:\n");
while(currentPtr !=NULL)
{
printf("%c--> ",currentPtr->data);
currentPtr=currentPtr->nextPtr;
}
printf("NULL\n\n");
}

}
****************************************************************
 
W

william

What does it mean by nodes are completely hidden(as being refered to,
nodes means the pointers to the actual struct block in memory, or the
structs themselves?)





I paste the sample code below, which came from the book 'C how to
program'. John, could you please offer me a good example of
implementation of linked list? Thank you.

**********************************************************************
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

struct listNode
{
char data;
struct listNode *nextPtr;

};

typedef struct listNode ListNode;
typedef ListNode *ListNodePtr;

void insert(ListNodePtr *, char);
char delete(ListNodePtr *, char);
int isEmpty(ListNodePtr);
void printList(ListNodePtr);
void instructions(void);

int main()
{
ListNodePtr startPtr=NULL;
int choice;
char item;

instructions(); //display the menu;
printf(">");
scanf("%d",&choice);

while(choice!=3)
{
switch (choice)
{
case 1:
printf("Enter a character: ");
scanf("\n%c",&item);
insert(&startPtr,item);
printList(startPtr);
break;

case 2:
if(!isEmpty(startPtr))
{
printf("Enter character to be deleted: ");
scanf("\n%c",&item);

if(delete(&startPtr,item))
{
printf("%c deleted.\n",item);
printList(startPtr);
}
else
printf("%c not found.\n\n",item);
}
else
printf("List is empty.\n\n");
break;
default:
printf("Invalid choice.\n\n");
instructions();
break;
}
printf(">");
scanf("%d",&choice);
}
printf("End of run.\n");
return 0;

}

void instructions(void)
{
printf("Enter your choice:\n");
printf("1 to insert an element into the list.\n"
"2 to delete an element from the list.\n"
"3 to exit the program.\n");

}

void insert(ListNodePtr *sPtr, char value)
{
ListNodePtr newPtr, previousPtr, currentPtr;

newPtr=malloc(sizeof(ListNode));
if(newPtr !=NULL)
{
newPtr->data=value;
newPtr->nextPtr=NULL;

//set the searching index(previousPtr and
//currentPtr)to the start of the list.
previousPtr=NULL;
currentPtr=*sPtr;

while(currentPtr !=NULL && value>currentPtr->data)
{
previousPtr=currentPtr;
currentPtr=currentPtr->nextPtr;
} //keep going

if(previousPtr==NULL)
{
newPtr->nextPtr=*sPtr;
*sPtr=newPtr;//insert the node at the beginning of the list
}
else
{
previousPtr->nextPtr=newPtr;
newPtr->nextPtr=currentPtr;
}
}
else
{
printf("%c not inserted. No memory available.\n",value);
}

}

char delete(ListNodePtr *sPtr, char value)
{
ListNodePtr previousPtr,currentPtr,tempPtr;

if (value==(*sPtr)->data)
{
tempPtr=*sPtr;
*sPtr=(*sPtr)->nextPtr;
free(tempPtr);
return value;
}
else
{
previousPtr=*sPtr;
currentPtr=(*sPtr)->nextPtr;//setup the cursor at the beginning

//when the cursor didn't reach the tail and cursor didn't find the
//specified value, the cursor keep going along the list
while(currentPtr !=NULL && currentPtr->data !=value)
{
previousPtr=currentPtr;
currentPtr=currentPtr->nextPtr;//move on to next node
}

if(currentPtr !=NULL)//if not reaching the tail
{
tempPtr=currentPtr;
previousPtr->nextPtr=currentPtr->nextPtr;
free(tempPtr);
return value;
}
}
return '\0';//return null char;

}

int isEmpty(ListNodePtr sPtr)
{
return sPtr==NULL;

}

void printList(ListNodePtr currentPtr)
{
if(currentPtr==NULL)
{
printf("List is Empty.\n\n");
}
else
{
printf("The list is:\n");
while(currentPtr !=NULL)
{
printf("%c--> ",currentPtr->data);
currentPtr=currentPtr->nextPtr;
}
printf("NULL\n\n");
}

}

****************************************************************

Above is all the code.

here is the segment that confuses me:

in 'main':
ListNodePtr startPtr=NULL;
....
....
insert(&startPtr,item);
....
And the prototype of 'insert' is:
void insert(ListNodePtr *, char);
// you can find the content in the code segment I posted just now.

So, is there any CONVENTION that how programmers implement different
data structure:
LINKED LIST
TREE
QUEQUE
STACK
and define operations on those data structure?

Where can I find a good resource talking about this?
 
I

Ian Collins

william said:
Above is all the code.

here is the segment that confuses me:

in 'main':
ListNodePtr startPtr=NULL;
....
....
insert(&startPtr,item);
....
And the prototype of 'insert' is:
void insert(ListNodePtr *, char);

What part of this confuses you? If insert didn't take the address of
startPtr, how could it change it?
 
K

Kai-Uwe Bux

william wrote:
[snip]
So, is there any CONVENTION that how programmers implement different
data structure:
LINKED LIST
TREE
QUEQUE
STACK
and define operations on those data structure?

Yes, there is: you don't implement them yourself, you use the standard
library instead. It provides (among other things):

std::list
std::queue
std::stack

and for problems involving search trees:

std::set, std::multiset
std::map, std::multimap

Where can I find a good resource talking about this?

Any introduction to the standard library should cover the standard container
classes and adaptors.


Best

Kai-Uwe Bux
 
J

John Harrison

I paste the sample code below, which came from the book 'C how to
program'. John, could you please offer me a good example of
implementation of linked list? Thank you.

I didn't realise you were programming in C. C and C++ are different
languages, what is good in C not the same as what is good in C++.

The code below is probably fine in C, but it wouldn't be good C++. In
C++ it's much easier to seperate the interface from the implementation.

If you haven't got your answer already (Ian has given you the answer)
you should probably ask questions about this code on comp.lang.c, it's C
not C++.

john
 
W

william

What part of this confuses you? If insert didn't take the address of
startPtr, how could it change it?
Thank you Ian, I understand it now. The whole structure is a
pointer(to the starting struct), so we need to change it if we insert
a new node at the beginning, right?
 
W

william

william wrote:

[snip]
So, is there any CONVENTION that how programmers implement different
data structure:
LINKED LIST
TREE
QUEQUE
STACK
and define operations on those data structure?

Yes, there is: you don't implement them yourself, you use the standard
library instead. It provides (among other things):

std::list
std::queue
std::stack

and for problems involving search trees:

std::set, std::multiset
std::map, std::multimap
Where can I find a good resource talking about this?

Any introduction to the standard library should cover the standard container
classes and adaptors.

Best

Kai-Uwe Bux

Thank you for your reply! I got it.

regards

Ji
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
473,766
Messages
2,569,569
Members
45,042
Latest member
icassiem

Latest Threads

Top