RCR #138 status?

Discussion in 'Ruby' started by Daniel Berger, Aug 17, 2004.

  1. Hi all,

    After reading Michael Neumann's blog
    (http://www.ntecs.de/blog/Blog/PythonDecorators.rdoc), I was wondering
    what the status of RCR #138 was?

    Here's the diff:

    --- eval.c 2 Aug 2004 08:52:53 -0000 1.686
    +++ eval.c 16 Aug 2004 12:52:28 -0000
    @@ -3701,7 +3701,7 @@
    rb_add_method(rb_singleton_class(ruby_class),
    node->nd_mid, defn, NOEX_PUBLIC);
    }
    - result = Qnil;
    + result = ID2SYM(node->nd_mid);
    }
    break;

    RCR 138 can be found at http://rcrchive.net/rcr/RCR/RCR138

    This seems like a nifty thing to have in 1.8.2. Any thoughts?

    Dan
    Daniel Berger, Aug 17, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Hi --

    On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Daniel Berger wrote:

    > Hi all,
    >
    > After reading Michael Neumann's blog
    > (http://www.ntecs.de/blog/Blog/PythonDecorators.rdoc), I was wondering
    > what the status of RCR #138 was?
    >
    > Here's the diff:
    >
    > --- eval.c 2 Aug 2004 08:52:53 -0000 1.686
    > +++ eval.c 16 Aug 2004 12:52:28 -0000
    > @@ -3701,7 +3701,7 @@
    > rb_add_method(rb_singleton_class(ruby_class),
    > node->nd_mid, defn, NOEX_PUBLIC);
    > }
    > - result = Qnil;
    > + result = ID2SYM(node->nd_mid);
    > }
    > break;
    >
    > RCR 138 can be found at http://rcrchive.net/rcr/RCR/RCR138
    >
    > This seems like a nifty thing to have in 1.8.2. Any thoughts?


    From the RCR process point of view, it's one of the legacy ones from
    Ruby Garden, which need to be resubmitted in the new format.


    David

    --
    David A. Black
    David A. Black, Aug 17, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. (Daniel Berger) wrote in message news:<>...
    > RCR 138 can be found at http://rcrchive.net/rcr/RCR/RCR138
    >
    > This seems like a nifty thing to have in 1.8.2. Any thoughts?


    that would be wonderful, please resubmit the rcr and I'll run to vote it.
    BTW you may wish to modify the return values of public/privatre/protected so that

    memoize \
    private \
    synchronized def foo
    ...
    end

    is the same that
    private\
    memoize\
    synchronized def foo
    ..
    end
    gabriele renzi @ google, Aug 17, 2004
    #3
  4. (Daniel Berger) wrote in message news:<>...
    > RCR 138 can be found at http://rcrchive.net/rcr/RCR/RCR138
    >
    > This seems like a nifty thing to have in 1.8.2. Any thoughts?


    that would be wonderful, please resubmit the rcr and I'll run to vote it.
    BTW you may wish to modify the return values of public/privatre/protected so that

    memoize \
    private \
    synchronized def foo
    ...
    end

    is the same that
    private\
    memoize\
    synchronized def foo
    ..
    end
    gabriele renzi @ google, Aug 17, 2004
    #4
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. saha
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    4,036
  2. Shug
    Replies:
    13
    Views:
    888
    Philipp
    Dec 15, 2006
  3. Shug
    Replies:
    13
    Views:
    942
    Philipp
    Dec 15, 2006
  4. Ruby Quiz

    [QUIZ] Count and Say (#138)

    Ruby Quiz, Sep 6, 2007, in forum: Ruby
    Replies:
    21
    Views:
    307
    Rubén Medellín
    Sep 10, 2007
  5. Ruby Quiz

    [SUMMARY] Count and Say (#138)

    Ruby Quiz, Sep 13, 2007, in forum: Ruby
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    140
    Ruby Quiz
    Sep 13, 2007
Loading...

Share This Page