Re: gcj compiled executable performance

Discussion in 'Java' started by Roedy Green, Mar 28, 2010.

  1. Roedy Green

    Roedy Green Guest

    On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:18:57 +0200, Donkey Hottie <>
    wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :

    >Or is gcj really THAT bad? If it is, I wonder why they bother with gcj
    >any more.


    You can use Jet. see http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jet.html

    Sun is getting so good with Hotspot the Jet marketing people are
    shifting from them speed advantage to obfuscation advantage.
    --
    Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
    http://mindprod.com

    If you tell a computer the same fact in more than one place, unless you have an automated mechanism to ensure they stay in sync, the versions of the fact will eventually get out of sync.
     
    Roedy Green, Mar 28, 2010
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Roedy Green

    Arne Vajhøj Guest

    On 28-03-2010 12:10, Roedy Green wrote:
    > On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:18:57 +0200, Donkey Hottie<>
    > wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :
    >> Or is gcj really THAT bad? If it is, I wonder why they bother with gcj
    >> any more.

    >
    > You can use Jet. see http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jet.html
    >
    > Sun is getting so good with Hotspot the Jet marketing people are
    > shifting from them speed advantage to obfuscation advantage.


    They should have done that shift 5+ years ago.

    Arne
     
    Arne Vajhøj, Mar 28, 2010
    #2
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Josephine Schafer
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    3,609
    Philip Morley
    Jul 21, 2003
  2. Klaus Schneider
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    555
    Rolf Magnus
    Dec 2, 2004
  3. lander
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    600
    bruce barker
    Mar 5, 2008
  4. Arne Vajhøj
    Replies:
    7
    Views:
    990
    Paul Cager
    Apr 4, 2010
  5. EJP
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    385
Loading...

Share This Page