Re: Python's super() considered super!

Discussion in 'Python' started by Michele Simionato, May 27, 2011.

  1. On Friday, May 27, 2011 10:49:52 AM UTC+2, Ben Finney wrote:
    > The exquisite care that you describe programmers needing to maintain is IMO
    > just as much a deterrent as the super-is-harmful essay.


    Worth quoting. Also I think this article may encourage naive programmers along the dark path of cooperative multiple inheritance, when they could instead use better designs.
     
    Michele Simionato, May 27, 2011
    #1
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Guest

    super.super.super how?

    Guest, Feb 19, 2005, in forum: Java
    Replies:
    24
    Views:
    10,870
    Darryl Pierce
    Feb 24, 2005
  2. Fernando Rodriguez

    Getting the super class via the super() function

    Fernando Rodriguez, Nov 21, 2003, in forum: Python
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    750
    Bob Willan
    Nov 22, 2003
  3. Kerim Borchaev

    super. could there be a simpler super?

    Kerim Borchaev, Jan 15, 2004, in forum: Python
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    493
    Michele Simionato
    Jan 15, 2004
  4. Raymond Hettinger

    Python's super() considered super!

    Raymond Hettinger, May 26, 2011, in forum: Python
    Replies:
    25
    Views:
    1,365
    Thomas Rachel
    May 28, 2011
  5. Michele Simionato

    Re: Python's super() considered super!

    Michele Simionato, May 27, 2011, in forum: Python
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    436
    Michele Simionato
    May 27, 2011
Loading...

Share This Page