Re: Signed multiplication revisited

Discussion in 'VHDL' started by KJ, Sep 11, 2008.

  1. KJ

    KJ Guest

    On Sep 10, 2:16 pm, Brian Drummond <>
    wrote:
    > On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:47:29 +0100, Jonathan Bromley
    >
    > When does the order of signal assignment matter within a process?
    > Apparently, when you are assigning them within a procedure, and using
    > XST for synthesis.
    >


    You've opened a case with Xilinx about this, right?

    > Frankly, I am astonished.
    > I have seen this in XST 7.1, 9.1, 9.2, and now 10.1.


    Makes me wonder why you would continue using the tool.

    > I would expect every synthesis tool to get this right.
    >


    Or at least respond a bit more promptly to bug reports to fix the
    tool.

    Kevin Jennings
     
    KJ, Sep 11, 2008
    #1
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Weng Tianxiang
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    3,153
    Weng Tianxiang
    Apr 7, 2005
  2. Christopher Dyken

    32x32 and 64x64 signed integer multiplication

    Christopher Dyken, Feb 17, 2004, in forum: C Programming
    Replies:
    18
    Views:
    1,462
    glen herrmannsfeldt
    Feb 24, 2004
  3. priya

    signed multiplication

    priya, Nov 16, 2006, in forum: VHDL
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    1,693
    priya
    Nov 17, 2006
  4. Andy
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    502
    Mike Treseler
    Sep 29, 2008
  5. William Hughes
    Replies:
    13
    Views:
    1,286
    Ben Bacarisse
    Mar 15, 2010
Loading...

Share This Page