Re: Year 2000 book still useful?

Discussion in 'Python' started by Aahz, Jun 27, 2003.

  1. Aahz

    Aahz Guest

    In article <JVOKa.3738$>,
    python newbie <> wrote:
    >
    >I just realized that the book I recently bought, "The Quick Python
    >Book", is dated 2000.
    >
    >Was wanting to know if there are certain areas where I shouldn't try to
    >learn, such as maybe OO concepts, so I don't learn outdated parts of
    >python ??


    There are lots of new features that won't be covered, but very little
    you learn will be invalid.
    --
    Aahz () <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/

    Usenet is not a democracy. It is a weird cross between an anarchy and a
    dictatorship.
    Aahz, Jun 27, 2003
    #1
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Otuatail

    Week of year to full Year

    Otuatail, Dec 8, 2003, in forum: HTML
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    964
    Toby A Inkster
    Dec 8, 2003
  2. Piet
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    311
    John J. Lee
    Apr 22, 2004
  3. user923005

    Re: lint still useful?

    user923005, Apr 11, 2008, in forum: C Programming
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    422
    jaysome
    Apr 12, 2008
  4. Robert Johnson
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    555
    George
    Jan 19, 2009
  5. Veerle
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    411
    niceguy
    Aug 20, 2003
Loading...

Share This Page