C
Charlton Wilbur
RH> I didn't know of this, but it is a perfect illustration of the
RH> fact that my point is perfectly serious (or, if you prefer,
RH> non-silly). This newsgroup would be the better for people
RH> being able to discuss such things rationally, rather than
RH> using insult as a substitute for thought.
It might be more useful to determine what element of the definition of
"IDE" you disagree on. By your definition of "IDE" Linux qualifies;
by theirs, the thought that Linux is an IDE is laughable. This looks
like a disagreement on definitions to me.
Charlton
RH> fact that my point is perfectly serious (or, if you prefer,
RH> non-silly). This newsgroup would be the better for people
RH> being able to discuss such things rationally, rather than
RH> using insult as a substitute for thought.
It might be more useful to determine what element of the definition of
"IDE" you disagree on. By your definition of "IDE" Linux qualifies;
by theirs, the thought that Linux is an IDE is laughable. This looks
like a disagreement on definitions to me.
Charlton