Of course, thank you for bringing this to our attention Brock.
I forgot the correct grammar even though I had to use "template containers"
in my grammar when learning to reference controls in the MasterPage.
Basically, as I am beginning to understand the 2.0 control tree, every
nested element of an HTML template becomes a control in the control tree
hierarchy. When referencing a "standard" control which may be located within
a template container -- a label or textbox for example -- we must use dotted
notation and a grammatical reference to each "template container" to
recreate the control tree hierarchy linearly. It would be great if we had a
"term" to refer to this grammatical process.
And if I'm not mistaken I don't think your reminder to use correct grammar
obviates the need for a cast. That would be correct ainna?
What I would like to master is when to decide to use public properties for
early bound references as I have this assumption that the use of public
properties allows standard controls which may be located within a template
container to be referenced directly.
This will be important for my own first use of the Wizard control which I am
just today finishing the HTML for and will need to access controls such as
CheckBoxList controls and so on. If public properties would make this
cleaner, more efficient and easier to code I'm all ears.
<%= Clinton Gallagher