As I have pointed out already, there is no such thing. See also
<
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/intro/sgmltut.html#h-3.2.1>, especially the last
paragraph of that section.
If you say so... no such thing? lol
Your creditability just went out the window... (you were losing it
fast anyway)
http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_div.asp
This is a technical newsgroup where technical discussions are led. Wouldn't
you agree that using the wrong terms in a technical discussion doesn't
exactly increase understanding of the matter discussed?
Im not here to learn language arts, my friend, Im here to ask a simple
question on how to write some javascript code to solve a problem. Dont
like the question? Dont respond. Simple.
Then either the user agent you have been testing with is utterly broken or,
what is more likely, you don't have a clue what you are doing. As for the
former, get a better UA. As for the latter, that is helped by reading
online documentation such as the CSS2 Specification I pointed you to, and
subscribing to the newsgroup comp.infosystems.
www.authoring.stylesheetsthat
other people have pointed you to already.
Obviously Im having some difficulty in getting what you think it
"should" be doing to do exactly that. Id hardly say I don't have a
clue. Or perhaps you don't quite have a clue what Im asking. Your
responses seem to indicate that anyway.
Thats ok. How about dont respond? Again, Im not asking about CSS or
XHTML so much, as I am on how to solve a *javascript* issue. Dont like
it? Dont respond.
The dynamics are built-in in (X)HTML, which is what you continue to fail to
realize.
<sigh> You most certainly are clueless. "The dynamics are built-in
in..." lol..no, the "dynamics" is my server side code (PHP, ASP,
ASP.NET...server side code, if you even know what that is...)
That is your problem alone. Usenet is not the kind of "ask for something,
get what you asked for" communication medium. And that is actually a Good
Thing, because you may have asked the wrong question, as in this case.
How about it's NOT your problem. Some other folks have actually tried
to help. Don't try to speak for all usenet. Your ego precedes you, by
about 100 miles. A question isn't wrong - an answer is.
It was more than 50% helpful because now you know that you are on the wrong
track.
Actually it just shows me you have a difficult time reading and
understanding questions. And to basically ignore you since you offer
nothing.
More of a trolling nature is your insistence to do something and keep asking
about it even though you have been advised against it and kindly asked to go
elsewhere with it several times, plus your ongoing failure to provide
sufficient evidence that what you are asking requires scripting which was
the cause of the former.
lol... first, YOU arent the sole authority here. Second, I do not
consider your condescending tone "kindly asking". Third, I do not
need to provide evidence that I must do something a certain way before
I ask a question. I missed where I was in
comp.lang.richardwiththebadattitude
Richard, in all seriousness. If you cant answer the question, then
don't bother. People like you are just annoying, and whats funny is
that in your own warped mind, you think that you're actually
helping.
For example..."How do you start a car?" People like you say "Well, you
dont actually _start_ a car... you begin the process of spinning the
crankshaft electronically <
www.somewebsitetoproveimsmart.com>, and
since you didnt phrase the question the way thats suits ME, then you
have no clue.".
People on usenet CAN be helpful; just as I hope I have helped you with
your personality issue. Have a good day.