Review my website!!!!

Discussion in 'HTML' started by 499nag, Apr 1, 2006.

  1. 499nag

    499nag Guest

    Can anyone review my website?
    The url is http://2search.co.nr

    If interested in link exchange contact me.
     
    499nag, Apr 1, 2006
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. 499nag

    Neredbojias Guest

    499nag wrote:
    > Can anyone review my website?
    > The url is http://2search.co.nr
    >
    > If interested in link exchange contact me.


    Pop-unders and small fixed text??

    Your site sucks.

    --
    Neredbojias
    Apprentice Critic
     
    Neredbojias, Apr 2, 2006
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. 499nag wrote:
    > Can anyone review my website?
    > The url is http://2search.co.nr
    >
    > If interested in link exchange contact me.
    >
    >

    The page took 14 seconds to load in FF on Win XP, 512KB ADSL (52kb
    actual) in Australia. Too long.
     
    TreatmentPlant, Apr 2, 2006
    #3
  4. 499nag

    Simon Guest

    "TreatmentPlant" <> wrote in message
    news:442f90dd$0$2111$...
    > 499nag wrote:
    >> Can anyone review my website?
    >> The url is http://2search.co.nr
    >>
    >> If interested in link exchange contact me.
    >>
    >>

    > The page took 14 seconds to load in FF on Win XP, 512KB ADSL (52kb actual)
    > in Australia. Too long.


    As a matter of interest, what would, (should?), be the maximum?

    Simon
    --
    http://urlkick.com/
    Free URL redirection service. Turns a long URL into a much shorter one.
     
    Simon, Apr 2, 2006
    #4
  5. 499nag

    Alan Illeman Guest

    "TreatmentPlant" <> wrote in message
    news:442f90dd$0$2111$...
    > 499nag wrote:
    > > Can anyone review my website?
    > > The url is http://2search.co.nr
    > >
    > > If interested in link exchange contact me.
    > >
    > >

    > The page took 14 seconds to load in FF on Win XP, 512KB ADSL (52kb
    > actual) in Australia. Too long.


    Took 4 secs to load in FF on Win2K Pro, 3Mbs ADSL (200 Kbs actual, as
    am too far from CO) in Canada. Website has no DOCTYPE !
     
    Alan Illeman, Apr 2, 2006
    #5
  6. 499nag

    saz Guest

    In article <1143941145.804631@localhost>, says...
    > Can anyone review my website?
    > The url is http://2search.co.nr
    >
    > If interested in link exchange contact me.
    >
    >
    >

    TROJAN ALERT! Ignore this post - EzTrust AV popped up with 4 different
    trojans!!!
     
    saz, Apr 2, 2006
    #6
  7. 499nag

    saz Guest

    Re: Review my website!!!! -DO NOT LOOK AT THIS SITE!!

    In article <1143941145.804631@localhost>, says...
    > Can anyone review my website?
    > The url is http://2search.co.nr
    >
    > If interested in link exchange contact me.
    >
    >
    >

    TROJAN ALERT! Ignore this post - EzTrust AV popped up with 4 different
    trojans!!!
     
    saz, Apr 2, 2006
    #7
  8. 499nag

    Martin Jay Guest

    In message <>, saz
    <> writes
    >In article <1143941145.804631@localhost>, says...
    >> Can anyone review my website?
    >> The url is http://2search.co.nr


    >> If interested in link exchange contact me.


    >TROJAN ALERT! Ignore this post - EzTrust AV popped up with 4 different
    >trojans!!!


    Well, it is just piggybacking off reputable website in an attempt to
    throw as many adverts at visitors as possible.
    --
    Martin Jay
     
    Martin Jay, Apr 2, 2006
    #8
  9. 499nag

    Dan Guest

    >Can anyone review my website?
    >The url is http://2search.co.nr


    >If interested in link exchange contact me.


    Why would anyone want to link exchange with an ugly website that
    doesn't do anything other than have pop-ups and dreadful graphics?

    Circa 20 seconds to load on Safari, Mac OS 10.4, 1024x768 over AirPort
    Express (and a half-meg broadband connection), in the UK.

    Grim mate. Grim.

    Dan
     
    Dan, Apr 2, 2006
    #9
  10. TreatmentPlant wrote:

    > 499nag wrote:
    >> Can anyone review my website?
    >> The url is http://2search.co.nr
    >>
    >> If interested in link exchange contact me.
    >>
    >>

    > The page took 14 seconds to load in FF on Win XP, 512KB ADSL (52kb actual)
    > in Australia. Too long.


    It took 16 seconds here (USA) on my dial-up connection.

    --
    Blinky RLU 297263
    Killing all posts from Google Groups
    The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
    Coming Soon: Filtering rules specific to various real news clients
     
    Blinky the Shark, Apr 2, 2006
    #10
  11. 499nag

    dorayme Guest

    In article <>,
    "Alan Illeman" <> wrote:

    > Took 4 secs to load in FF on Win2K Pro, 3Mbs ADSL


    Please do not come here to boast. Some of us are still on dialup.

    --
    dorayme
     
    dorayme, Apr 3, 2006
    #11
  12. 499nag

    dorayme Guest

    In article
    <>,
    Blinky the Shark <> wrote:

    > TreatmentPlant wrote:
    >
    > > 499nag wrote:
    > >> Can anyone review my website?
    > >> The url is http://2search.co.nr
    > >>
    > >> If interested in link exchange contact me.
    > >>
    > >>

    > > The page took 14 seconds to load in FF on Win XP, 512KB ADSL (52kb actual)
    > > in Australia. Too long.

    >
    > It took 16 seconds here (USA) on my dial-up connection.


    16 sec as well, using stop watch, after clearing cache (in case
    of any prior access), Sydney, dial up.

    --
    dorayme
     
    dorayme, Apr 3, 2006
    #12
  13. 499nag

    Jim Moe Guest

    499nag wrote:
    > Can anyone review my website?
    > The url is http://2search.co.nr
    >

    What website!!!! ?

    --
    jmm (hyphen) list (at) sohnen-moe (dot) com
    (Remove .AXSPAMGN for email)
     
    Jim Moe, Apr 3, 2006
    #13
  14. Simon wrote:
    > "TreatmentPlant" <> wrote in message
    > news:442f90dd$0$2111$...
    >
    >>499nag wrote:
    >>
    >>>Can anyone review my website?
    >>>The url is http://2search.co.nr
    >>>
    >>>If interested in link exchange contact me.
    >>>
    >>>

    >>
    >>The page took 14 seconds to load in FF on Win XP, 512KB ADSL (52kb actual)
    >>in Australia. Too long.

    >
    >
    > As a matter of interest, what would, (should?), be the maximum?
    >
    > Simon

    Someone (?) once published the results of some study that says that
    people will lose interest in a web page if they have to wait longer than
    7 seconds for the page to load.

    Some web designers get around this by having a page render in separate
    stages so that at least the customer can see something happening, or at
    least start reading some information, while the entire page might take
    longer to load.

    I personally don't like this. I use my dad as my page tester. He is in
    the 'bush' on the world's slowest dialup account (lucky to get 19KBps on
    most nights). If a page loads in less than 7 seconds on his account
    then I am satisfied! (Sans video / audio)
     
    TreatmentPlant, Apr 3, 2006
    #14
  15. 499nag

    Jim Higson Guest


    >>>The page took 14 seconds to load in FF on Win XP, 512KB ADSL (52kb
    >>>actual)
    >>>in Australia. Too long.

    >>
    >>
    >> As a matter of interest, what would, (should?), be the maximum?
    >>
    >> Simon

    > Someone (?) once published the results of some study that says that
    > people will lose interest in a web page if they have to wait longer than
    > 7 seconds for the page to load.
    >
    > Some web designers get around this by having a page render in separate
    > stages


    I'd have thought using progressive rendering was down to the browser - is
    there any way you can control this?

    I can think of a few ways to do this for things other than HTML - using
    progressive images or avoiding tables for example.

    > {snip}
     
    Jim Higson, Apr 3, 2006
    #15
  16. 499nag

    499nag Guest

    Re: Review my website!!!! -DO NOT LOOK AT THIS SITE!!

    Are you paranoid or something!
    This website was clean, is clean, and will continue clean.
    The URL is dead now!!!!!!!!!!

    "saz" <> escreveu na mensagem
    news:...
    > In article <1143941145.804631@localhost>, says...
    > > Can anyone review my website?
    > > The url is http://2search.co.nr
    > >
    > > If interested in link exchange contact me.
    > >
    > >
    > >

    > TROJAN ALERT! Ignore this post - EzTrust AV popped up with 4 different
    > trojans!!!
     
    499nag, Apr 4, 2006
    #16
  17. 499nag

    dorayme Guest

    Re: Review my website!!!! -DO NOT LOOK AT THIS SITE!!

    In article <1144126666.444070@localhost>,
    "499nag" <> wrote:

    > Are you paranoid or something!
    > This website was clean, is clean, and will continue clean.
    > The URL is dead now!!!!!!!!!!
    >
    > "saz" <> escreveu na mensagem
    > news:...
    > > In article <1143941145.804631@localhost>, says...
    > > > Can anyone review my website?
    > > > The url is http://2search.co.nr
    > > >
    > > > If interested in link exchange contact me.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >

    > > TROJAN ALERT! Ignore this post - EzTrust AV popped up with 4 different
    > > trojans!!!


    This is what my browser said when trying to access the site that
    saz was warning about:

    "Domain name: 2SEARCH.CO.NR - has been suspended.

    It means this domain name has been suspanded for some reason.
    Probably becouse of the violation of CO.NR Terms of Service or
    CO.NR Rules."

    In other words, you have "probably" been a naughty boy, not as
    clean as you should be and saz has probable cause...

    Plus you used a server that is administered by folk that badly
    need but don't bother to use a spellchecker.

    These are facts, 499nag, me, I have not a paranoid bone in my
    body[1]

    1. For more than that I have no bones.

    --
    dorayme
     
    dorayme, Apr 4, 2006
    #17
  18. 499nag

    Neredbojias Guest

    Re: Review my website!!!! -DO NOT LOOK AT THIS SITE!!

    To further the education of mankind, dorayme
    <> declaimed:

    > In other words, you have "probably" been a naughty boy, not as
    > clean as you should be and saz has probable cause...
    >
    > Plus you used a server that is administered by folk that badly
    > need but don't bother to use a spellchecker.
    >
    > These are facts, 499nag, me, I have not a paranoid bone in my
    > body[1]
    >
    > 1. For more than that I have no bones.


    What are you, an amoeba?

    --
    Neredbojias
    Infinity can have limits.
     
    Neredbojias, Apr 5, 2006
    #18
  19. 499nag

    499nag Guest

    Just wondering
    Pop-unders or Pop-under?

    "Neredbojias" <http://www.neredbojias.com/fliam.php?cat=alt.html> escreveu
    na mensagem news:d184f$442f402f$43888f29$...
    > 499nag wrote:
    > > Can anyone review my website?
    > > The url is http://2search.co.nr
    > >
    > > If interested in link exchange contact me.

    >
    > Pop-unders and small fixed text??
    >
    > Your site sucks.
    >
    > --
    > Neredbojias
    > Apprentice Critic
     
    499nag, Apr 5, 2006
    #19
  20. 499nag

    499nag Guest

    Yes it has DOCTYPE, in all pages.


    "Alan Illeman" <> escreveu na mensagem
    news:...
    >
    > "TreatmentPlant" <> wrote in

    message
    > news:442f90dd$0$2111$...
    > > 499nag wrote:
    > > > Can anyone review my website?
    > > > The url is http://2search.co.nr
    > > >
    > > > If interested in link exchange contact me.
    > > >
    > > >

    > > The page took 14 seconds to load in FF on Win XP, 512KB ADSL (52kb
    > > actual) in Australia. Too long.

    >
    > Took 4 secs to load in FF on Win2K Pro, 3Mbs ADSL (200 Kbs actual, as
    > am too far from CO) in Canada. Website has no DOCTYPE !
    >
    >
     
    499nag, Apr 5, 2006
    #20
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Hywel Jenkins
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    609
    Hywel Jenkins
    Jul 28, 2003
  2. brucie
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    590
    brucie
    Jul 28, 2003
  3. DU
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    427
  4. Richard
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    578
    Richard
    Jul 28, 2003
  5. www
    Replies:
    51
    Views:
    1,514
Loading...

Share This Page