Review my website!!!!

[499nag]

Can anyone review my website?
The url is http://2search.co.nr

If interested in link exchange contact me.

 

[Neredbojias]

Can anyone review my website?
The url is http://2search.co.nr

If interested in link exchange contact me.

Pop-unders and small fixed text??

Your site sucks.

 

[TreatmentPlant]

Can anyone review my website?
The url is http://2search.co.nr

If interested in link exchange contact me.

The page took 14 seconds to load in FF on Win XP, 512KB ADSL (52kb
actual) in Australia. Too long.

 

[Simon]

The page took 14 seconds to load in FF on Win XP, 512KB ADSL (52kb actual)
in Australia. Too long.

As a matter of interest, what would, (should?), be the maximum?

Simon

 

[Alan Illeman]

The page took 14 seconds to load in FF on Win XP, 512KB ADSL (52kb
actual) in Australia. Too long.

Took 4 secs to load in FF on Win2K Pro, 3Mbs ADSL (200 Kbs actual, as
am too far from CO) in Canada. Website has no DOCTYPE !

 

[saz]

Can anyone review my website?
The url is http://2search.co.nr

If interested in link exchange contact me.

TROJAN ALERT! Ignore this post - EzTrust AV popped up with 4 different
trojans!!!

 

[saz]

Can anyone review my website?
The url is http://2search.co.nr

If interested in link exchange contact me.

TROJAN ALERT! Ignore this post - EzTrust AV popped up with 4 different
trojans!!!

 

[Martin Jay]

TROJAN ALERT! Ignore this post - EzTrust AV popped up with 4 different
trojans!!!

Well, it is just piggybacking off reputable website in an attempt to
throw as many adverts at visitors as possible.

 

[Dan]

Can anyone review my website?

The url is http://2search.co.nr

If interested in link exchange contact me.

Why would anyone want to link exchange with an ugly website that
doesn't do anything other than have pop-ups and dreadful graphics?

Circa 20 seconds to load on Safari, Mac OS 10.4, 1024x768 over AirPort
Express (and a half-meg broadband connection), in the UK.

Grim mate. Grim.

Dan

 

[Blinky the Shark]

The page took 14 seconds to load in FF on Win XP, 512KB ADSL (52kb actual)
in Australia. Too long.

It took 16 seconds here (USA) on my dial-up connection.

 

[dorayme]

Took 4 secs to load in FF on Win2K Pro, 3Mbs ADSL

Please do not come here to boast. Some of us are still on dialup.

 

[dorayme]

It took 16 seconds here (USA) on my dial-up connection.

16 sec as well, using stop watch, after clearing cache (in case
of any prior access), Sydney, dial up.

 

[Jim Moe]

Can anyone review my website?
The url is http://2search.co.nr

What website!!!! ?

 

[TreatmentPlant]

As a matter of interest, what would, (should?), be the maximum?

Simon

Someone (?) once published the results of some study that says that
people will lose interest in a web page if they have to wait longer than
7 seconds for the page to load.

Some web designers get around this by having a page render in separate
stages so that at least the customer can see something happening, or at
least start reading some information, while the entire page might take
longer to load.

I personally don't like this. I use my dad as my page tester. He is in
the 'bush' on the world's slowest dialup account (lucky to get 19KBps on
most nights). If a page loads in less than 7 seconds on his account
then I am satisfied! (Sans video / audio)

 

[Jim Higson]

Someone (?) once published the results of some study that says that
people will lose interest in a web page if they have to wait longer than
7 seconds for the page to load.

Some web designers get around this by having a page render in separate
stages

I'd have thought using progressive rendering was down to the browser - is
there any way you can control this?

I can think of a few ways to do this for things other than HTML - using
progressive images or avoiding tables for example.

 

[499nag]

Are you paranoid or something!
This website was clean, is clean, and will continue clean.
The URL is dead now!!!!!!!!!!

 

[dorayme]

Are you paranoid or something!
This website was clean, is clean, and will continue clean.
The URL is dead now!!!!!!!!!!

This is what my browser said when trying to access the site that
saz was warning about:

"Domain name: 2SEARCH.CO.NR - has been suspended.

It means this domain name has been suspanded for some reason.
Probably becouse of the violation of CO.NR Terms of Service or
CO.NR Rules."

In other words, you have "probably" been a naughty boy, not as
clean as you should be and saz has probable cause...

Plus you used a server that is administered by folk that badly
need but don't bother to use a spellchecker.

These are facts, 499nag, me, I have not a paranoid bone in my
body[1]

1. For more than that I have no bones.

 

[Neredbojias]

To further the education of mankind, dorayme

In other words, you have "probably" been a naughty boy, not as
clean as you should be and saz has probable cause...

Plus you used a server that is administered by folk that badly
need but don't bother to use a spellchecker.

These are facts, 499nag, me, I have not a paranoid bone in my
body[1]

1. For more than that I have no bones.

What are you, an amoeba?

 

[499nag]

Just wondering
Pop-unders or Pop-under?

Pop-unders and small fixed text??

Your site sucks.

 

[499nag]

Yes it has DOCTYPE, in all pages.

Took 4 secs to load in FF on Win2K Pro, 3Mbs ADSL (200 Kbs actual, as
am too far from CO) in Canada. Website has no DOCTYPE !