R
Raveman
I just played with WebService in jdk6 and i dont understand why its like
rmi - I have to generate classes. why they were able to make ejb3 simple,
but this @WebService annotation needs all this generated classes. Maybe
because it uses rmi, why rmi is that way ? from what i know its just a
server that sends/receive serialized objects. I remember i wrote webserver
once in java and i havent used code generation. Shouldnt they just make a
higher level of abstraction? Please tell me. They make everything simpler,
but rmi will never change and everybody is ok with that.
rmi - I have to generate classes. why they were able to make ejb3 simple,
but this @WebService annotation needs all this generated classes. Maybe
because it uses rmi, why rmi is that way ? from what i know its just a
server that sends/receive serialized objects. I remember i wrote webserver
once in java and i havent used code generation. Shouldnt they just make a
higher level of abstraction? Please tell me. They make everything simpler,
but rmi will never change and everybody is ok with that.