J
JNY
That response wasn't supposed to appear on that thread. I'm still not
sure how it did. It made alot more sense on the correct thread.
sure how it did. It made alot more sense on the correct thread.
R
Richard Bos
_What_ response on _what_ thread? You have managed to get
Google-Broken-Beta remove every single reference from your post. Learn
to force Google-Broken-Beta to thread correctly (and quote correctly,
and indent correctly, and, and, and...) or get a real newsreader. The
way you're posting now it's nearly impossible to figure out what you're
talking about.
Richard
K
Keith Thompson
If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use the
"Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on "show options" at
the top of the article, then click on the "Reply" at the bottom of the
article headers.
C
CBFalconer
Keith said:
I have taken the liberty of modifying your comment as a sig, whose
use will be periodic until google actually fixes their interface.
K
Keith Thompson
CBFalconer said:
I'm not too pleased about being quoted inexactly, so ...
If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers.
Your quotation is now retroactively exact.
It's an honor to be quoted in someone else's sig. See below.
M
Mike Wahler
Keith Thompson said:
What's different?
(I took my car to a mechanic today. When he asked what the trouble
was, I told him "When I applied the brakes, it groups.googled, and
went right through the red light.")
-Mike
B
Ben Pfaff
Keith Thompson said:
I agree.
K
Keith Thompson
Ben Pfaff said:
Me too.
(That should be just about enough, I think.)
K
Keith Thompson
Mike Wahler said:
In my original statement, I wrote "don't use the "Reply" link".
CBFalconer amended it to "don't use the broken "Reply" link".
M
Mike Wahler
Keith Thompson said:
Ah. I suppose I have a broken visual parser.
-Mike