Rubygem's gemri broken?

Discussion in 'Ruby' started by gga, Jan 17, 2007.

  1. gga

    gga Guest

    > gem -v
    0.9.0

    > gemri String

    /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/ri/ri_descriptions.rb:99:in `concat': can't
    convert nil into Array (TypeError)
    from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/ri/ri_descriptions.rb:99:in
    `merge_in'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/ri/ri_reader.rb:56:in `get_class'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/ri/ri_reader.rb:52:in `get_class'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/ri/ri_driver.rb:70:in
    `report_class_stuff'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/ri/ri_driver.rb:106:in
    `get_info_for'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/ri/ri_driver.rb:135:in
    `process_args'
    from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/ri/ri_driver.rb:134:in
    `process_args'
    from /usr/bin/gemri:24

    > gemri Hoe

    [snip] OK

    > ri String

    [snip] OK
    gga, Jan 17, 2007
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. gga

    Eric Hodel Guest

    On Jan 17, 2007, at 14:15, gga wrote:

    >> gem -v

    > 0.9.0


    Please try with 0.9.1.

    If you're using ruby 1.8.5 (and possibly 1.8.4) you can just ignore
    gemri.

    --
    Eric Hodel - - http://blog.segment7.net

    I LIT YOUR GEM ON FIRE!
    Eric Hodel, Jan 18, 2007
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. gga

    gga Guest

    Eric Hodel wrote:
    > On Jan 17, 2007, at 14:15, gga wrote:
    >
    > >> gem -v

    > > 0.9.0

    >
    > Please try with 0.9.1.


    Same error.

    >
    > If you're using ruby 1.8.5 (and possibly 1.8.4) you can just ignore
    > gemri.
    >


    How? ri does not find the docs to gems.
    gga, Jan 18, 2007
    #3
  4. gga

    Eric Hodel Guest

    On Jan 18, 2007, at 14:35, gga wrote:
    > Eric Hodel wrote:
    >> On Jan 17, 2007, at 14:15, gga wrote:
    >>
    >>>> gem -v
    >>> 0.9.0

    >>
    >> Please try with 0.9.1.

    >
    > Same error.


    ok, please file a bug.

    http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?atid=575&group_id=126&func=browse

    >>
    >> If you're using ruby 1.8.5 (and possibly 1.8.4) you can just ignore
    >> gemri.
    >>

    >
    > How? ri does not find the docs to gems.


    Lies. (Unless you're using ruby 1.8.5.)

    $ ri ZenTest
    --------------------------------------------------------- Class: ZenTest
    ZenTest scans your target and unit-test code and writes your
    missing code based on simple naming rules, enabling XP at a much
    quicker pace. ZenTest only works with Ruby and Test::Unit.


    --
    Eric Hodel - - http://blog.segment7.net

    I LIT YOUR GEM ON FIRE!
    Eric Hodel, Jan 20, 2007
    #4
  5. gga

    Eric Hodel Guest

    On Jan 19, 2007, at 16:59, Eric Hodel wrote:
    > On Jan 18, 2007, at 14:35, gga wrote:
    >> Eric Hodel wrote:
    >>> If you're using ruby 1.8.5 (and possibly 1.8.4) you can just ignore
    >>> gemri.

    >>
    >> How? ri does not find the docs to gems.

    >
    > Lies. (Unless you're using ruby 1.8.5.)


    Sorry, ruby older than 1.8.5.

    --
    Eric Hodel - - http://blog.segment7.net

    I LIT YOUR GEM ON FIRE!
    Eric Hodel, Jan 20, 2007
    #5
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Steven D'Aprano

    Why are "broken iterators" broken?

    Steven D'Aprano, Sep 21, 2008, in forum: Python
    Replies:
    8
    Views:
    628
  2. Cameron Simpson

    Re: Why are "broken iterators" broken?

    Cameron Simpson, Sep 22, 2008, in forum: Python
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    556
    Cameron Simpson
    Sep 22, 2008
  3. Fredrik Lundh

    Re: Why are "broken iterators" broken?

    Fredrik Lundh, Sep 22, 2008, in forum: Python
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    582
    Fredrik Lundh
    Sep 22, 2008
  4. Charles Comstock

    rubygem BUG

    Charles Comstock, May 3, 2004, in forum: Ruby
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    94
    Chad Fowler
    May 3, 2004
  5. gabriele renzi

    madeleine gem problem (or rubygem one)

    gabriele renzi, May 4, 2004, in forum: Ruby
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    150
    Gavin Sinclair
    May 5, 2004
Loading...

Share This Page