H
Hal Fulton
A few people in recent weeks have been bemoaning the fact that software
projects (in the RAA and elsewhere) often consist of "mostly leading
zeroes."
I have been thinking about this. Some very valid points have been made.
But at the same time, it seems to me that many projects nowadays are
1) following the "release often" model and 2) hoping to attract
contributors and collaborators.
And these two issues are probably linked.
In any case, if a release is made, say, every ten days -- I think it
makes sense to have leading zeroes. The alternative, it seems to me,
is that in a year we are all using Version 47.5 of the software.
That might be preferable to some, but I like to think of version 1.0
as being of at least post-beta quality (although we all know it really
starts being useful at 1.1).
Just my opinion.
Hal
projects (in the RAA and elsewhere) often consist of "mostly leading
zeroes."
I have been thinking about this. Some very valid points have been made.
But at the same time, it seems to me that many projects nowadays are
1) following the "release often" model and 2) hoping to attract
contributors and collaborators.
And these two issues are probably linked.
In any case, if a release is made, say, every ten days -- I think it
makes sense to have leading zeroes. The alternative, it seems to me,
is that in a year we are all using Version 47.5 of the software.
That might be preferable to some, but I like to think of version 1.0
as being of at least post-beta quality (although we all know it really
starts being useful at 1.1).
Just my opinion.
Hal