session objects vs.custom httpcontext obj

[Chance Hopkins]

which if faster?

which has less overhead?

I'm guessing the custom httpcontext obj on both, if I'm wrong could someone fill me in.

Thx

 

[Alvin Bruney]

What do you mean by custom httpcontext obj?

 

[Chance Hopkins]

an object set like this:

System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.CallContext.SetData(ContextKey,CoreContext);

 

[John Saunders]

an object set like this:

System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.CallContext.SetData(ContextKey,CoreContext
);

That sort of context has nothing to do with HttpContext.

 

[Chance Hopkins]

do you know if it have "less or more" overhead than an iis/aspnet session object? as far as memory and read/write time

 

[John Saunders]

do you know if it have "less or more" overhead than an iis/aspnet session

object? as far as memory and read/write time

I don't know. Which is saltier, apples or oranges?
--
John

"John Saunders" <john.saunders at surfcontrol.com> wrote in message news:[email protected]...

 

[Chance Hopkins]

**** you

do you know if it have "less or more" overhead than an iis/aspnet session

object? as far as memory and read/write time

I don't know. Which is saltier, apples or oranges?

 

[John Saunders]

**** you

How very professional.

My point was that you're asking the wrong question. The other type of
context has nothing at all to do with ASP.NET. Forget you ever heard of it.

 

[Chance Hopkins]

your an idiot, I'm using it successfully...and that wasn't my question.

cause it WORKS!!!