T
Travis Newbury
kchayka said:Having it doesn't mean you use it.
bla bla bla bla bla
kchayka said:Having it doesn't mean you use it.
Jose said:Yes, but what a web deigner values in the look of a site is often not what
the user values.
› > See you make the assumption that viewers don't want to be awed too.
›
› Yes, I make that assumption. I don't think it's unreasonable that the
› view of a site is different from designer to user... in most cases a web
› site is =about= a thing, and not the thing itself. But for the web
› designer, it =is= the thing itself.
xyZed said:At the same time, a site that looks amateurish can lose credibility
with a substantial amount of visitors. Personally, I aim for something
that looks well designed in the sense of nicely laid out and easy to
use, but with content being the revered king. I think users looking
for "information" just want to see nicely laid out, easily accessible
content and anything else just gets in the way.
xyZed said:I've just used a few parts of the template and tried to keep the same
feel to the site. Currently the home page and a few of the main
sections are the new design while the rest of the site is the old
tabbed design.
I hope people think it is an improvement.
› In article <[email protected]>,
›
› > I've just used a few parts of the template and tried to keep the same
› > feel to the site. Currently the home page and a few of the main
› > sections are the new design while the rest of the site is the old
› > tabbed design.
› >
› > I hope people think it is an improvement.
›
› It looks nice. Washing suds blue eh? Why not post a link to how
› it did look before to remind us?
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.