As MVC tells about the code reusebility so the case would be like this:
Model : Business Tier/ Data Tier
view : aspx pages
controller : ASP.Net Runtime
In above case we can reuse the Model i.e. basically data/Business Tier to other application also which have same functionality.
We can also reuse the aspx pages in different manner.
In every .aspx project, we are using the ASP.Net runtime that is also the example of the reusability.
At some place code behind file is used as the Model or controller that is not correct as i think.Because we can't use code behind in other place rather than that .aspx file in which we have already implemented.
If we will seperate then code behind and aspx file then we can't reuse then on other places.
<NehalDOTNET> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
>
> What is the significance in using MVC architechture in Dotnet?
>
> I think the framework itself is based on MVC
> The view being the Asp.Net
> The Controller being the code-behind file ....
>
> Is that so?
>
>