Some theory

R

Ravi

This question is related to OMT. Suppose we are given two classes:
expression and functions, to be represented by a class diagram.
Expressions are aggregation of functions (is-a-part-of relationship)
while functions are themselves aggregate of expressions.
But aggregation is not a symmetric relation. So how to reprsent thin
in a class diagram.
 
R

red floyd

Ravi said:
This question is related to OMT. Suppose we are given two classes:
expression and functions, to be represented by a class diagram.
Expressions are aggregation of functions (is-a-part-of relationship)
while functions are themselves aggregate of expressions.
But aggregation is not a symmetric relation. So how to reprsent thin
in a class diagram.

This is OT for comp.lang.c++, the posting to comp.object is correct.

Followups set to comp.object
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
473,744
Messages
2,569,483
Members
44,903
Latest member
orderPeak8CBDGummies

Latest Threads

Top