Speed and portability of XML parsers

Discussion in 'XML' started by Nikhil, May 3, 2005.

  1. Nikhil

    Nikhil Guest

    Hi,

    Does anybody knows faster parsers than C - RXP in validating category
    and Expat in non-validating category?

    Are both of them (or their faster ones) portable in Mac OS X?

    Thanks,

    Nikhil
     
    Nikhil, May 3, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Nikhil wrote:

    > Does anybody knows faster parsers than C - RXP in validating category
    > and Expat in non-validating category?


    In the XMLgawk project, we also use Expat.
    Expat really is fast and portable.

    > Are both of them (or their faster ones) portable in Mac OS X?


    We had no problems in using Expat with MacOSX.
     
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Kahrs?=, May 4, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. In article <>,
    Nikhil <> wrote:

    >Does anybody knows faster parsers than C - RXP in validating category
    >and Expat in non-validating category?
    >
    >Are both of them (or their faster ones) portable in Mac OS X?


    RXP compiles on MacOS X without problems.

    -- Richard
     
    Richard Tobin, May 4, 2005
    #3
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Replies:
    1
    Views:
    749
    Esmond Pitt
    Mar 27, 2005
  2. Thomas Guettler

    xml.parsers.expat vs. xml.sax

    Thomas Guettler, Apr 27, 2004, in forum: Python
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    898
    Martijn Faassen
    Apr 27, 2004
  3. Replies:
    2
    Views:
    372
  4. kaens
    Replies:
    6
    Views:
    332
    Stefan Behnel
    May 23, 2007
  5. kaens
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    382
    kaens
    May 23, 2007
Loading...

Share This Page