StackFrame not working on Windows Server 2003

Discussion in 'ASP .Net' started by Joe Rattz, Jun 14, 2005.

  1. Joe Rattz

    Joe Rattz Guest

    Moved some asp.net code using StackFrame (built in debug mode) to a Windows
    Server 2003 box and get empty filename and filelinenumber back. Anyone know
    why? Works just fine on Win2k.
    Joe Rattz, Jun 14, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Joe Rattz

    Scott Allen Guest

    Hi Joe:

    Did you also copy the .pdb files to the new server? These files
    contain the symbols used to map instructions to source files and line
    numbers, without them you'd be missing that info from a stack trace.

    --
    Scott
    http://www.OdeToCode.com/blogs/scott/


    On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 15:48:12 -0400, "Joe Rattz" <>
    wrote:

    >Moved some asp.net code using StackFrame (built in debug mode) to a Windows
    >Server 2003 box and get empty filename and filelinenumber back. Anyone know
    >why? Works just fine on Win2k.
    >
    Scott Allen, Jun 15, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. Joe Rattz

    Joe Rattz Guest

    Yes, I did move that over too. Not in my initial test, but subsequently I
    read something that made me feel that would be necessary. The source code
    doesn't have to be there does it?


    "Scott Allen" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > Hi Joe:
    >
    > Did you also copy the .pdb files to the new server? These files
    > contain the symbols used to map instructions to source files and line
    > numbers, without them you'd be missing that info from a stack trace.
    >
    > --
    > Scott
    > http://www.OdeToCode.com/blogs/scott/
    >
    >
    > On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 15:48:12 -0400, "Joe Rattz" <>
    > wrote:
    >
    > >Moved some asp.net code using StackFrame (built in debug mode) to a

    Windows
    > >Server 2003 box and get empty filename and filelinenumber back. Anyone

    know
    > >why? Works just fine on Win2k.
    > >

    >
    Joe Rattz, Jun 15, 2005
    #3
  4. Joe Rattz

    Scott Allen Guest

    No - you should not need any source code. Odd.

    On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:07:55 -0400, "Joe Rattz" <>
    wrote:

    >Yes, I did move that over too. Not in my initial test, but subsequently I
    >read something that made me feel that would be necessary. The source code
    >doesn't have to be there does it?
    >
    >
    >"Scott Allen" <> wrote in message
    >news:...
    >> Hi Joe:
    >>
    >> Did you also copy the .pdb files to the new server? These files
    >> contain the symbols used to map instructions to source files and line
    >> numbers, without them you'd be missing that info from a stack trace.
    >>
    >> --
    >> Scott
    >> http://www.OdeToCode.com/blogs/scott/
    >>
    >>
    >> On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 15:48:12 -0400, "Joe Rattz" <>
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >> >Moved some asp.net code using StackFrame (built in debug mode) to a

    >Windows
    >> >Server 2003 box and get empty filename and filelinenumber back. Anyone

    >know
    >> >why? Works just fine on Win2k.
    >> >

    >>

    >


    --
    Scott
    http://www.OdeToCode.com/blogs/scott/
    Scott Allen, Jun 15, 2005
    #4
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Ben Fidge
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    1,119
    Ben Fidge
    Jan 15, 2005
  2. Replies:
    0
    Views:
    838
  3. Replies:
    0
    Views:
    349
  4. Ken.C
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    554
    Chris Uppal
    Feb 7, 2007
  5. Random

    read parameters through StackFrame

    Random, Aug 13, 2007, in forum: ASP .Net
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    321
    Random
    Aug 13, 2007
Loading...

Share This Page