std::string::push_back vs. std::string::operator+=

[Matthias =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=E4ppler?=]

Hi,

I just browsed libstdc++6-doc and stumbled over a string operation I haven't
noticed before: string:ush_back.
If for example I want to append single characters to an std::string, which
one would be better, or is there any difference at all:

mystr.push_back( c );

or

mystr += c;

Any ideas? I used to use the latter one.

Regards,
Matthias

 

[Rob Williscroft]

Matthias Käppler wrote in in
comp.lang.c++:

Hi,

I just browsed libstdc++6-doc and stumbled over a string operation I
haven't noticed before: string:ush_back.

push_back() is there so that std::string conforms as "Back
Insertion Sequence".

Because its there you can use std::back_inserter with std::string
for example. Or any other generic algorithm that requires a back
insertion sequence.

If for example I want to append single characters to an std::string,
which one would be better, or is there any difference at all:

mystr.push_back( c );

or

mystr += c;

Any ideas? I used to use the latter one.

Whichever you want, they both do the same thing.

Rob.

 

[Jonathan Mcdougall]

I just browsed libstdc++6-doc and stumbled over a string operation I haven't

noticed before: string:ush_back.
If for example I want to append single characters to an std::string, which
one would be better, or is there any difference at all:

mystr.push_back( c );

or

mystr += c;

They behave the same way but logically they do different things.
push_back() is there because std::string is a container and operator +=
it there because it's a string. The same thing with size() and length().

Jonathan