The Point where the FNVW is asked about eligibility for a GAB award <Re

[This account has been banned becaus]

From: "This account has been banned becaus"
<this.account.has.been.banned.becaus@1:261/38.remove-5bm-this>

From: This account has been banned because it violated the Google Groups Terms
Of Use <[email protected]>

NNTP-Posting-Host: 74.14.135.55

Only half of it.

Nearly all of it, given it's rarely custom-subclasses.

People who write code are just as important as those who use it.

That does not make sense. Both clients and subclassers are "people who
write code".

But you thus show that you realize that there would be a need for
change if the contract changed.

Qagh Sopbe'.
Huh?

Entirely beside the point, given how little change.

And you don't know how easy it would be to update it,
since the implementation to change will itself be used by other code,
which then will need to change

QoH! It won't, since changing the implementation keySet return type to
SortedSet won't force change on clients of that code, and it's
unlikely for the implementation to be itself subclassed, and even more
unlikely for such a subclass to be overriding the superclass
implementation of keySet.

thus requiring unit tests, regression tests,
deployment to a zillion production sites, possible new bugs to fix,
delays to other more critical feature improvements or repair, and a
whole lot of cost to Java projects overall.

Tojo'Qa'!

Huh?

What a ridiculous slippery slope argument.

sorted. You'd just need to implement first, last, subSet, tailSet, and
headSet, and you could make all of those (in presumably an anonymous
inner class of your map) punt to MySortedMap.this.firstKey(), lastKey
(), subMap(x,y).keySet(), tailMap(x).keySet(), and headMap(y).keySet
().

It would take all of five minutes.

[calls me a liar]

Grrr! TlhIngan quv DatIchDI' Seng yIghuH!

Paula, are you off your meds?

If anyone here is a lying petaQ ... well, let's just say that it is
not I!


VeQ! There are probably only a handful, if that.

This doesn't look like you're winning at all, for ****'s sake.

(FNVW, is it possible to nominate Paul "Two Socks" Derbyshire for the Goofy
Azzed Babboon for this very old post?)


--
If you want to see something lamer than John Edward Kook's Aratzio frogeries,
check out Scatboi's forgeries.
"It's not paranoia when it's careful analysis of a trail of forensic
evidence gathered from post headers, fuckwit." - writes
Feerless Forensic Usenet Investigator, Nadless the Derbyshite sock.
Then Nadless The Kook presents his 'forensic evidence' of 'outright forgery':
<[email protected]> = From: Nadegda <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> = From: Nadegda <[email protected]>

-+- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
+ Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
-+- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
* Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

 

[Nadegda]

To: This account has been banned becaus
From: "Nadegda" <nadegda@1:261/38.remove-5bm-this>

To: This account has been banned becaus
From: Nadegda <[email protected]>

[silent followup-to denied. And why are you crossposting your kookfeud with
"Derbyshire" to comp.lang.java.programmer, kooky?]

NNTP-Posting-Host: 74.14.135.55


On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:10:23 GMT, Captain Koloth Derbyshite
(FNVW, is it possible to nominate Paul "Two Socks" Derbyshire for the
Goofy Azzed Babboon for this very old post?)

*You* cannot nominate anyone for anything, Offishul AUK Spankling.

Furthermore, I am assuming you mutated that attribution line in your usual
manner and it actually only said "Captain Koloth" or similar. If so, the new
rules forbid real-lifing the guy unless he's an outerfilther himself.

Lastly, there's no evidence the name you stated is the name of the poster that
wrote that old article anyway.

P.S. You are obviously a complete nincompoop when it comes to Star Trek. The
poster of that old article was obviously acting the part of a Klingon, for
whatever reason. Where was it, in a Star Trek group? (Since you didn't post a
message-ID, did alter the attribution line, and didn't specify the group, I
can't find it.)

-+- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
+ Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
-+- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
* Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

 

[This account has been banned becaus]

To: Nadegda
From: "This account has been banned becaus"
<this.account.has.been.banned.becaus@1:261/38.remove-5bm-this>

To: Nadegda
From: This account has been banned because it violated the Google Groups Terms
Of Use <[email protected]>

[silent followup-to denied

Restored; you've already stunk up that group enough, Paul Derbyshire.

And why are you crossposting your kookfeud
with "Derbyshire" to comp.lang.java.programmer<SLAP>

Paul G. Derbyshite, stop speaking about yourself in the third person.

*You*<SLAP>

Shut up, Paul Derbyshite; you are not the FNVW.



--
If you want to see something lamer than John Edward Kook's Aratzio frogeries,
check out Scatboi's forgeries.
"It's not paranoia when it's careful analysis of a trail of forensic
evidence gathered from post headers, fuckwit." - writes
Feerless Forensic Usenet Investigator, Nadless the Derbyshite sock.
Then Nadless The Kook presents his 'forensic evidence' of 'outright forgery':
<[email protected]> = From: Nadegda <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> = From: Nadegda <[email protected]>

-+- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
+ Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
-+- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
* Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

 

[Nadegda]

To: Nadegda
From: Nadegda <[email protected]>

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 18:16:46 GMT,

[snip froggery]

Wrong.

Not the XanaNews frogger/forger this time, and doesn't look like Stalemate or
Morphy either. Posted through a server I've never heard of before, too.

OK, which twit is frogging me this time? And why are you bothering
comp.lang.java.programmer, AGAIN, with this silly feud? Based on that fact
alone I'm guessing Account Banned as the likely culprit, but lack proof (and,
unlike a kook, freely admit that I lack proof).

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
* Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24