Think you've got a new decorator syntax?

[Steven Bethard]

You probably don't. Here's a script that generates (almost) all of
the proposals so far. Don't worry, there's only 1224 that are both
not currently valid syntax and also easily greppable.

http://ucsu.colorado.edu/~bethard/py/decorators.py

And the output (throwing away any syntaxes that were currently valid
or not easily greppable):

http://ucsu.colorado.edu/~bethard/py/decorators-output.py

Steve

 

[David Fraser]

You probably don't. Here's a script that generates (almost) all of
the proposals so far. Don't worry, there's only 1224 that are both
not currently valid syntax and also easily greppable.

http://ucsu.colorado.edu/~bethard/py/decorators.py

And the output (throwing away any syntaxes that were currently valid
or not easily greppable):

http://ucsu.colorado.edu/~bethard/py/decorators-output.py

Steve

Excellent! I propose that we accept *ALL* of the syntaxes! Flexibility!

David