J
Jon Shemitz
[I'm not sure if this is the right ng - apologies if not, and ptrs
requested.]
If I create a BaseClass in a BaseAssembly, then derive a MiddleClass
in a MiddleAssembly from the BaseClass, a TopAssembly that derives a
TopClass from MiddleClass (or just creates a MiddleClass instance)
needs to reference both MiddleAssembly and BaseAssembly at compile
time, even if it does not directly use any code from BaseAssembly.
Why? Why isn't the reference to MiddleAssembly - which is the only one
directly using code from BaseAssembly - sufficient?
requested.]
If I create a BaseClass in a BaseAssembly, then derive a MiddleClass
in a MiddleAssembly from the BaseClass, a TopAssembly that derives a
TopClass from MiddleClass (or just creates a MiddleClass instance)
needs to reference both MiddleAssembly and BaseAssembly at compile
time, even if it does not directly use any code from BaseAssembly.
Why? Why isn't the reference to MiddleAssembly - which is the only one
directly using code from BaseAssembly - sufficient?