M
Michael Persaud
Is that possible??
MP
MP
S
Scott M.
No.
A
Alvin Bruney [MVP]
It is.
you can use either a webservice or xml-http to go get the data and return it
to requesting page. you would need to manually load the data into the table
(datagrid renders clientside as a table i believe)
but it's a lot of unrewarding work. why would you want to go this route? is
a postback that intolerable?
you can use either a webservice or xml-http to go get the data and return it
to requesting page. you would need to manually load the data into the table
(datagrid renders clientside as a table i believe)
but it's a lot of unrewarding work. why would you want to go this route? is
a postback that intolerable?
S
Scott M.
But if you are updating via a webservice or xmlHTTP, then you are making
another trip to the server (or rather a server) and this is what I took the
OP to be asking if could be avoided.
another trip to the server (or rather a server) and this is what I took the
OP to be asking if could be avoided.
Alvin Bruney said:
E
Eliyahu Goldin
What sort of update do you mean? If you mean re-populating with new server
data, you have to make a round trip to the server. If the information for
update originates on the client side, you can update the grid easily with
DHTML.
Eliyahu
data, you have to make a round trip to the server. If the information for
update originates on the client side, you can update the grid easily with
DHTML.
Eliyahu
A
Alvin Bruney [MVP]
agreed, i was just being picky 
--
Regards,
Alvin Bruney
[ASP.NET MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/default.aspx]
Got tidbits? Get it here... http://tinyurl.com/27cok
--
Regards,
Alvin Bruney
[ASP.NET MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/default.aspx]
Got tidbits? Get it here... http://tinyurl.com/27cok
Scott M. said:
A
Alvin Bruney [MVP]
moot point but it occurred to me - perhaps erroneously - that the postback
flash was what was irritating and not the postback itself.
flash was what was irritating and not the postback itself.