Usability Job Opportunities

S

Steve

Jerry Stuckle said:
Jade,

Naw, this doesn't hurt at all. I've had much better people try to hurt me
and they haven't.

Now if I cared at all what they though, it would hurt. But I don't.

But I do appreciate the sentiment.

dude! you don't even understand *sarcasm*...LOL.
 
A

AtlantaWanker

Joeseph said:
Sure it is. Since his server IS my server, you're lying yet again.
Nice try.



You didn't post any.




You have no customers. You have no website. You're a liar and a fraud.


Liar. We all know there is no site.



If it's password protected, what reason would you have to hide it
other than that it doesn't exist?

that's some pretty swell logic, there, idiot. LOL

so all things that are private or hidden don't exist according to your
genius-like proclamation?

Osama Bin Laden: doesn't exist
Jimmy Hoffa: never existed
encrypted data: doesn't exist
secret military installments: don't exist
intelligence of databasix retards: DIVIDE BY ZERO ERROR
 
S

Steve

Gary L. Burnore said:
Of course we all know anyone can have say they're a Corp. The ICCA
doesn't care if you're a corporation or one person. They DO care if
you do things that embarass them.

or forget to pay your dues. :)

save this forum and jerry's sig association with them, i doubt jerry has
embarassed anyone. he'd first have to have clients for which he'd
'work'...he simply lack the professional opportunity to do so.
 
A

AtlantaWanker

Gary said:
Jerry's so lucky to have a friend like you.

whoopsie!

did i refute some AUKtard's claim that comcast doesn't allow webservers or
something?

nslookup netkooks.org

LOL
 
R

RafaMinu

Wow Jerry, I had no idea you were guilty of "delicuency"!

That sounds pretty bad. As soon as someone makes up a meaning to go with the
made up word I'm sure we'll all be shocked by how bad it is!

Just change a "c" for a "q", smartalec, no big deal really, sharpen up
a little, you must be about the only one that couldn't make sense of
the word.

de·lin·quen·cy (d-lngkwn-s, -ln-)
n. pl. de·lin·quen·cies
1. Juvenile delinquency.
2. Failure to do what law or duty requires.
3. An offense or a misdemeanor; a misdeed.
4. A debt or other financial obligation on which payment is overdue.

All of them apply to Jerry, even the juvenile one. Childish, rather...
 
R

RafaMinu

That would be the "JDS Computer Training Corp" which can't be a member of
the Independent Computer Consultants Association., because it doesn't exist
I take it?

Do you mean the one located at this URL:
http://www.icca.org/member/memberpage.asp?id=400

... that claims to have "provided high-quality programmer training
courses to customers throughout the United States and in Asia and
Europe since 1990" ?

Yes, right, that's the one.
I have already e-mailed the Independent Computer Consultants
Association to bring that fact to their attention, but instead of
taking appropriate action, they warned Jerry by e-mail, who in turn
posted the contents here.
Thanks to Jerry's help, all have been recorded and now there's no
doubt about the intentions on every side.
 
R

RafaMinu

(e-mail address removed),




Jerry, you know I've backed you up many times, so I hope you will accept
this advice in the spirit it is offered.
That says it all about you Red.
As long as you are willing to argue with these people, they are going to
use that. It doesn't matter who is right or who "owns" who, all most of
The fact is that it DOES matter.
He's been proved to be a SCAMMER and you know it since a long time
ago.
But you have said nothing.
the regs here are going to notice is that the noise level has increased
substantially and that you are right in the middle of it. You don't have
to defend yourself or the spamcopping and there is nothing to be gained
by arguing with Kooks.

He's not defending himself, he is attacking anyone that proves him
wrong.

And if you want to disqualify anyone, be man enough at least to say it
at their faces by not cutting off the thread to the Groups where all
those posters that you are insulting come from.

Alternatively you can stay off the thread, I told you already ...
 
C

Chris F.A. Johnson

Gary L. Burnore wrote: ....

ROFLMAO, troll. I OWN YOU. You just proved it again.

Isn't it ironic: here you are, Jerry, strengthening Gary's point
while he himself is undermining it!
 
G

Gary L. Burnore

Isn't it ironic: here you are, Jerry, strengthening Gary's point
while he himself is undermining it!

Just trying to give him some more rope. Fun, ain't it?
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
 
B

Baho Utot

(Secret Agent X) said:
Hi Baho!

It's a shame you left AWW, your knowledge of Unix (Linux) was
invaluable to many. As you may have gathered, almost all the old
regulars have left, all we have now are the spammers and
analy-retentive, plus one or two well meaning folk who try to offer
assistance to genuine issues.

X

Well I did add aww back to my news server so I could see if the spat jerry
has with the world would go the twelve rounds.

I will have a look at aww to watch and see if that group implodes or if it
rights its self.
 
B

Baho Utot

Chris said:
Isn't it ironic: here you are, Jerry, strengthening Gary's point
while he himself is undermining it!

Since this thread is grossly off topic....

How are you Chris,

I was given a copy of your book, It does have some interesting shell
scripts in it.

Got any more I might have a look at?
 
K

K. A. Cannon

Read back in the thread. The troll Gary L. Burnore added your newsgroup
to the list.

No he didn't.
Are you this stupefyingly ignorant of how UseNet works?
ROFLMAO! You can't even go back and see what the first message was
posted to?

No....I suggest you figure out how to read headers and learn how
attribution works.

The more you declare "I knows it" the more ignorant you look.
I did. Check this thread. And actually, it wasn't a FUP - I went back
and got the post where Gary added it. I posted the headers in this thread.

No...how about you really figure out who added alt.fucknozzles to the
newsgroup line.
I find it funny - it looks like the troll's entire usenet server has
been banned from some of the other servers!

Right. You don't understand the concept of troll and troller and
trollee. I bet you have problems with many simple everyday thinks
normal people take for granted.
What do you care? It's a private site, for registered users only, and
requires a userid/password to access.

Good...prove it.

If you need a userid/password why are you so afraid to let people know
about it?

maybe it doesn't exist....like your intelligence...it's a phantom.



--
K. A. Cannon
kcannon at insurgent dot org
(change the orgy to org to reply)

http://www.insurgent.org/

#9 People ruining UseNet lits.
#6 Top Assholes on the Net lits.
#5 Most hated Usenetizens of all time
#15 AUK psychos and felons lits
#5 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine
 
R

RafaMinu

That's true, Red.  And I'm done.
That much is true. Done and over with.
One of them has tried to extort money from me, threatening to spread
lies about me all over the internet unless I pay him.  I have already
been in contact with the local D.A.'s office about it and will be taking
it to him tomorrow.
No chance Jerry, I've already told you that I have already reported
your SCAM practices and sent e-mails to the appropriate authorities,
companies and individuals concerned.
And as for the Federal D.A.  I had a meeting with him today and showed
him what is going on.  He is arranging a meeting with the State
Department later this week.  With them, we will be approaching the
Spanish Embassy about this problem.
Hey, we can make a party all together ¡¡¡
I'l throw in the wine, red of course, a Rioja seems most appropriate.
So I'm out of it now.  I've turned it over to the proper authorities,
and have notified certain people if they do get email to save it and it
will be turned over to the authorities, also.
Be sure to show them also the contents of the e-mail sent to you by
the Independent Computer Consultants Association and that you
diligently posted in Usenet afterwards.
If you can't find it don't worry, I'll send you a copy.
And I have been advised it is better not to have any further contact
with them.  It's in the legal system now, and they can hang themselves.
  Any further communications from me might harm the case.

Your mental case is hopeless Jerry, learn to live with it, but please
do not try to harm anybody who is not to blame of your sorryful
situation, that is anybody except yourself.
Abstaining from drinking too much alcohol would certainly help, also.

BTW, whatever happened with those not so "legal" measures you were
going to take?
 
G

Gary L. Burnore

That much is true. Done and over with.

No chance Jerry, I've already told you that I have already reported
your SCAM practices and sent e-mails to the appropriate authorities,
companies and individuals concerned.

Maybe we'll get lucky and he'll actually have made something up to
give to a DA. He'll get caught and arrested for filing a false
report.
Hey, we can make a party all together ¡¡¡
I'l throw in the wine, red of course, a Rioja seems most appropriate.

Be sure to show them also the contents of the e-mail sent to you by
the Independent Computer Consultants Association and that you
diligently posted in Usenet afterwards.
If you can't find it don't worry, I'll send you a copy.

Post it! :)
Your mental case is hopeless Jerry, learn to live with it, but please
do not try to harm anybody who is not to blame of your sorryful
situation, that is anybody except yourself.
Abstaining from drinking too much alcohol would certainly help, also.

BTW, whatever happened with those not so "legal" measures you were
going to take?

He forgets about things like discovery. :)
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
 
R

RafaMinu

Most likely he was referring to something of the kind of when he was
taken to Court for DOMESTIC VIOLENCE:

=============

seriously, did you google to get that info? either you are OMH, or you've
just googled something he posted. that, or you made it up. there are
websites that store public data, which arrest records would definitely be.
they only charge a small fee to query it.

personally, i don't think jerry-berry is violent. i wouldn't be surprised,
however, to see that he's spent time in psych wards - also public data.

as for the suing...you missed his post where he shows he's illiterate and
illogical. it equated to him saying that law suits were illegal. a good
laugh was had by all...even jerry, oblivious to his own stupidity, laughed
thinking we couldn't read. irony meter off the scale, the rest of us just
laughed harder.

djou see his way of bowing out of the ass beating? 'my lawyer says not to
post to this thread any more'. lol.

anyway, cheers.

Actually it was quite easy to get the info.
In Maryland, laws exist to ensure that state government is open and
that the public has access to appropriate records and information in
its possession. That includes the Maryland Judiciary.
Some information is restricted though, so there could be more
surprises.

The problem with Jerry is that he thinks that by insulting and
threatening anybody that disagrees with him, he's going to win the
point. I don't know if that tactic has worked for him in the past but
I can assure you it won't work with me. On the contrary, the more he
insults me and threatens me, the more I'm going to expose him for what
he really is. And I'll go as far as it takes.

I'd be delighted if he sues me, but he won't, because he is basically
a pathetic liar. He's very stupid too, because someone in his position
would try to keep a low profile.

And as for the violent not-so-legal ways of winning arguments, I'm
absolutely sure that he would use them if he could.
I am not the only poster he has threatened, he's even publicily
threatened twice to kill someone whose only crime was to point out at
an obvious mistaken assesment of his at comp.lang.php.

What baffles me is that there are people, specially at
alt.www.webmaster, who back him up all the way, and that's something
of which I still have to find out the real reasons behind the scenes.
 
S

Steve

The problem with Jerry is that he thinks that by insulting and
threatening anybody that disagrees with him, he's going to win the
point. I don't know if that tactic has worked for him in the past but
I can assure you it won't work with me. On the contrary, the more he
insults me and threatens me, the more I'm going to expose him for what
he really is. And I'll go as far as it takes.


============

i can't tell you how many times i've told jerry that. shit, have a look in
c.l.p. i'll say he's not quite right about something and five day later
you've got a thread the length of...i don't know...something *very* long.
and 90% of it is ad-hom, you-are-no-you-are language.

============
 
R

RafaMinu

The problem with Jerry is that he thinks that by insulting and
threatening anybody that disagrees with him, he's going to win the
point. I don't know if that tactic has worked for him in the past but
I can assure you it won't work with me. On the contrary, the more he
insults me and threatens me, the more I'm going to expose him for what
he really is. And I'll go as far as it takes.

============

i can't tell you how many times i've told jerry that. shit, have a look in
c.l.p. i'll say he's not quite right about something and five day later
you've got a thread the length of...i don't know...something *very* long.
and 90% of it is ad-hom, you-are-no-you-are language.

============

I didn't know what "ad-hom" meant:
<http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ad hominem>
ad hominem [ad hom-uh-nuhm?nem, ahd-] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA
Pronunciation
adjective
[snip to the usage I intended.]
2. attacking an opponent's character rather than answering his
argument.

and from Wikipedia:
"An ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin:
"argument to the man", "argument against the man") consists of
replying to an argument or factual claim by attacking or appealing to
a characteristic or belief of the person making the argument or claim,
rather than by addressing the substance of the argument or producing
evidence against the claim. The process of proving or disproving the
claim is thereby subverted, and the argumentum ad hominem works to
change the subject.

It is most commonly used to refer specifically to the ad hominem
abusive, or argumentum ad personam, which consists of criticizing or
personally attacking an argument's proponent in an attempt to
discredit that argument.

Other common subtypes of the ad hominem include the ad hominem
circumstantial, or ad hominem circumstantiae, an attack which is
directed at the circumstances or situation of the arguer; and the ad
hominem tu quoque, which objects to an argument by characterizing the
arguer as acting or arguing in accordance with the view that he is
arguing against.

Ad hominem arguments are always invalid in syllogistic logic, since
the truth value of premises is taken as given, and the validity of a
logical inference is independent of the person making the inference.
However, ad hominem arguments are rarely presented as formal
syllogisms, and their assessment lies in the domain of informal logic
and the theory of evidence.[1] The theory of evidence depends to a
large degree on assessments of the credibility of witnesses, including
eyewitness evidence and expert witness evidence. Evidence that a
purported eyewitness is unreliable, or has a motive for lying, or that
a purported expert witness lacks the claimed expertise can play a
major role in making judgements from evidence.

Argumentum ad hominem is the inverse of argumentum ad verecundiam, in
which the arguer bases the truth value of an assertion on the
authority, knowledge or position of the person asserting it. Hence,
while an ad hominem argument may make an assertion less compelling, by
showing that the person making the assertion does not have the
authority, knowledge or position they claim, or has made mistaken
assertions on similar topics in the past, it cannot provide an
infallible counterargument."

Yep, that's Jerry for sure ...
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
473,743
Messages
2,569,478
Members
44,899
Latest member
RodneyMcAu

Latest Threads

Top