j> Tad & Uri, you guys are painfully presumptuous. And more often than
j> not, wrong.
considering that tad and i have both done professional perl training, me
thinks you are a bit off base.
j> I have a very clear understanding of how "web apps work." The question
j> was simply to ask if you guys knew of a way to do so, since I do not.
if you knew about web apps, you wouldn't have asked such a silly
question. the simple case of a non-browser accessing your app makes your
concept null and void. the news for you is there ain't no url bar in
those programs! the bigger news is that http doesn't support anything
like the server asking the browser for info. the conclusion is that you
don't know how http works. this makes us correct. sherlock would be proud!
j> The thing is, you guys are under the false impression that you know
j> everything. You do not. You do not know me, nor do you know my level
j> of knowledge or expertise. I asked a question. That's all.
we don't know everything. we do know enough about http and perl and web
apps to know your question was wacko. and then to claim you run a web
app team and still didn't know that, was icing on the cake.
j> Here's a real question for you, Tad. When's the last time you actually
j> gave a Perl related answer to a question on this newsgroup? I can't
j> remember seeing one. It makes me wonder just how much you actually
j> know about the language.
j> Geez. No wonder this newsgroup is nothing but spam. Oh, well, spam and
j> assholes.
i know you aren't a spammer. so you must be the other choice! btw, there
is actuallly little spam here. usenet does a decent job of deleting spam.
j> Don't bother replying. I'm so tired of wasting my time with childish
j> pricks.
then stop playing with yourself!
(like dynamiting fish in a barrel!
please do come back for more tutoring on web apps.
uri