K
KMA
Just a general Q, but how do people feel about whether their html (or
ASP.NETs html product) validates according w3org standards?
I've just gone through a few hoops to get the warnings cleaned off my site.
I feel happy that the site is now clean internally, but there wasn't an iota
of difference in the rendered display in any browser that I could detect.
Does anybody view such validation as a sign of website/programmer quality.
Internal quality, I mean, obviously the content and layout could still
stink.
ASP.NETs html product) validates according w3org standards?
I've just gone through a few hoops to get the warnings cleaned off my site.
I feel happy that the site is now clean internally, but there wasn't an iota
of difference in the rendered display in any browser that I could detect.
Does anybody view such validation as a sign of website/programmer quality.
Internal quality, I mean, obviously the content and layout could still
stink.