Verilog's integer and reg?

[Davy]

Hi all,

I heard that Verilog has integer type.
Someone said integer can be signed or unsigned.
How to declear signed integer?

And what's the difference with integer and reg signed [31:0](2's
complement) ?

Any suggestions will be appreciated!
Best regards,
Davy

 

[Chris F Clark]

And what's the difference with integer and reg signed [31:0](2's

complement) ?

1) You need [at least partial] 2001 support to use "reg signed". It
isn't in the 1995 standard.

2) A variable declared integer is not necessarily exactly 32 bits
wide. If I recall correctly, it must be at least 32 bits wide, but
it could be 64 bits wide if that were more convenient to the
implementation.

3) In some implementations, I have found wierd artifacts occur when
using integers in calculations that were longer that 32 bits wide,
they didn't necessarily sign extend in consistent ways past the 32
bit length, sometimes they would sign extend and other times that
would 0 pad.

4) You can't do bit-selects or part-selects on integers, just on
regs (and wires, et al).

5) You shouldn't use "integer" declarations for things like flops or
signals that will exist as actual circuitry (partially because of 2
through 4). You should use integer declarations only for for look
indexes and similar items that "go away" as the design is turned
into silicon. You can use integers in non-synthesizable code,
e.g. testbench parts.

Thus, if your tools are modern and support the current standard,
you should use "reg signed" when you want a synthesizable part that
works in a signed way. If you don't have modern tools, life is
more difficult.

 

[Chris F Clark]

I incorrectly said:

through 4). You should use integer declarations only for for look I meant:
through 4). You should use integer declarations only for for loop
indexes and similar items that "go away" as the design is turned

-Chris

 

[Andy Peters]

I heard that Verilog has integer type.
Someone said integer can be signed or unsigned.
How to declear signed integer?

Integers are always signed, and (usually, see Chris Clark's comment) 32
bits wide.

And what's the difference with integer and reg signed [31:0](2's
complement) ?

Nothing, but it's often a convenience to have a signed value that is
not 32 bits wide.

-a

 

[omara007]

When doing synthesis for a verilog code that includes a declared integer used as an array index, I get the following error:

Range bounds are not constants.


Effectively the original Verilog code is like this :

integer index;
always @ (uuoutstgsp or uusel_sel) begin
index = 0;
while (uusel_sel[index] == 0) begin
index = index + 1;
end
uumux32to1sp = uuoutstgsp[(index*30)+29 : (index*30)];
end

so, what's the problem of this code ?

 

[partha]

...replying the possible error of ur program is that dont put
uusel_sel[index] in the left hand side....for this the possible change u hav to do is to declare a reg temp dump the "uusel_sel[index] " in it then use temp in the condition loop

reg temp
integer index;
always @ (uuoutstgsp or uusel_sel) begin
index = 0;
temp=uusel_sel[index] ;
while (temp== 0) begin
index = index + 1;
end
uumux32to1sp = uuoutstgsp[(index*30)+29 : (index*30)];
end