Video: Professor of Physics Phd at Cal Tech says: 911 Inside Job

S

stj911

Cal Tech is the ELITE of ELITE in physics.

If Feynman were alive, he would point his finger straight at the 911
criminal operators, the yank bastards themselves .......

http://www.911blogger.com/node/8101

No self-respecting scientist should keep his mouth shut. Its a
fundamental challenge to the method of science, a detective work most
demanding of INTELLECTUAL HONESTY.
 
G

Gib Bogle

Cal Tech is the ELITE of ELITE in physics.

If Feynman were alive, he would point his finger straight at the 911
criminal operators, the yank bastards themselves .......

http://www.911blogger.com/node/8101

No self-respecting scientist should keep his mouth shut. Its a
fundamental challenge to the method of science, a detective work most
demanding of INTELLECTUAL HONESTY.

When did the University of Iowa (Iowhere?) become CalTech.
 
J

Jonathan Kirwan

When did the University of Iowa (Iowhere?) become CalTech.

"Grabbe earned his PhD from Caltech in 1978. He is a graduate of
Caltech, but has no current academic appointment there."

So I read, anyway.

Jon
 
B

Bill Habr

Cal Tech is the ELITE of ELITE in physics.

If Feynman were alive, he would point his finger straight at the 911
criminal operators, the yank bastards themselves .......

http://www.911blogger.com/node/8101

No self-respecting scientist should keep his mouth shut. Its a
fundamental challenge to the method of science, a detective work most
demanding of INTELLECTUAL HONESTY.

Isn't this the guy who has more conspiracy theories than Carter has pills?

Whitewater, Vince Foster, moon landing hoax one week - we found a UFO on the moon the
next, Oklahoma City bombing, a new conspiracy every day ad nauseum?
 
D

Dave L. Renfro

Gib said:
When did the University of Iowa (Iowhere?) become CalTech.

http://www.physics.uiowa.edu/~cgrabbe/

Yikes! This is less than 2 miles from where I live.
Plus, there's Alexander Abian who, before he died,
was down the road a bit at Iowa State University.
And then there were the physics department shootings
here a few years ago (5 killed, 3 of whom were
professors in the physics department).

Maybe I shouldn't be drinking the water.

Dave L. Renfro
 
W

War Office

Isn't this the guy who has more conspiracy theories than Carter has pills?

Whitewater, Vince Foster, moon landing hoax one week - we found a UFO on the moon the
next, Oklahoma City bombing, a new conspiracy every day ad nauseum?

Why can't any of you just discuss the fact that free-fall collapse of
this building contradicts the laws of physics (God's law whom gave you
and God's children whom's mass murder in Iraq you have allowed)?

Why do you all have to avoid the topic and rather go on a chracter
assassination which is totally abhorent to scientific method?
 
W

War Office

Isn't this the guy who has more conspiracy theories than Carter has pills?

Whitewater, Vince Foster, moon landing hoax one week - we found a UFO on the moon the
next, Oklahoma City bombing, a new conspiracy every day ad nauseum?

Why can't any of you just discuss the fact that free-fall collapse of
this building contradicts the laws of physics?

Why do you all have to avoid the topic and rather go on a character
assassination which is totally abhorent to scientific method?
 
E

Eric Gisse

Why can't any of you just discuss the fact that free-fall collapse of
this building contradicts the laws of physics?

Why do you all have to avoid the topic and rather go on a character
assassination which is totally abhorent to scientific method?

....because that's all that is left.
 
E

Eric Gisse

Cal Tech is the ELITE of ELITE in physics.

"INN World Report interviewed Dr. Crockett Grabbe - professor of
physics at the University of Iowa - regarding his thoughts on the
'collapses' of WTC1, WTC2, & WTC7. In this interview he lists numerous
reasons to suspect controlled demolition and expresses support for
alternative theories."

A common mistake - I frequently confuse CalTech and U of Iowa.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?h...ckett+grabbe+author:c-grabbe+iowa&btnG=Search

That's interesting, no publications on any engineering topic. A
professor of physics, not engineering, who claims that explosives were
planted in not only WTC7, but WTC 1 and 2 which were trigged by the
planes impacting the building.

Why is anyone listening to this loon?
If Feynman were alive, he would point his finger straight at the 911
criminal operators, the yank bastards themselves .......

I don't recall Feynman ever advocating nutcase positions.
http://www.911blogger.com/node/8101

No self-respecting scientist should keep his mouth shut. Its a
fundamental challenge to the method of science, a detective work most
demanding of INTELLECTUAL HONESTY.

I love how folks like you ask for intellectual honesty when every
effort is made to ignore evidence that doesn't agree with your
presupposed findings.
 
M

Michael A. Terrell

Eric said:
"INN World Report interviewed Dr. Crockett Grabbe - professor of
physics at the University of Iowa - regarding his thoughts on the
'collapses' of WTC1, WTC2, & WTC7. In this interview he lists numerous
reasons to suspect controlled demolition and expresses support for
alternative theories."

A common mistake - I frequently confuse CalTech and U of Iowa.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?h...ckett+grabbe+author:c-grabbe+iowa&btnG=Search

That's interesting, no publications on any engineering topic. A
professor of physics, not engineering, who claims that explosives were
planted in not only WTC7, but WTC 1 and 2 which were trigged by the
planes impacting the building.

Why is anyone listening to this loon?


The same reason they listen to the even loonier Rosie O'donell?

http://www.popularmechanics.com/blogs/911myths/4213805.html


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
S

Salmon Egg

Why can't any of you just discuss the fact that free-fall collapse of
this building contradicts the laws of physics?

Why do you all have to avoid the topic and rather go on a character
assassination which is totally abhorent to scientific method?

Sometimes, when I pee into the toilet, a few droplets rise to heights that
defy god's laws. Do I have magic urine?

-- If there is such a thing as intelligent design, please explain
hemorrhoids.
 
W

War Office

...because that's all that is left.

But no-one has critiqued Steven Jones' thesis. And this guy Professor
Emeritus of Physics concurs with Jones' thesis.

I challenge you to find any tenured or emirtus professor who has
written a counter thesis to Jones'

You realise everyone is still waiting for NIST to publish their final
report and that in Dec 2006 they announced that they would investigate
the explosives hypothesis as well as thermite to explain the molten
steel?

So as you can appreciate then this is still a current issue even
Officially.

Thus your feigned answer "...because that's all that is left" is a
lie.

Can you show me past threads of your own where you have argued about
this Jones' thesis to any detail?
 
W

War Office

"INN World Report interviewed Dr. Crockett Grabbe - professor of
physics at the University of Iowa - regarding his thoughts on the
'collapses' of WTC1, WTC2, & WTC7. In this interview he lists numerous
reasons to suspect controlled demolition and expresses support for
alternative theories."

A common mistake - I frequently confuse CalTech and U of Iowa.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&client=firefox-a...

That's interesting, no publications on any engineering topic. A
professor of physics, not engineering, who claims that explosives were
planted in not only WTC7, but WTC 1 and 2 which were trigged by the
planes impacting the building.

Why is anyone listening to this loon?

There is no engineering professor or less who has written a counter-
thesis to Jones' thesis Why Indeed Did The Twin Towers Completely
Collapse
http://www.journalof911studies.com/...ollapse_Jones_Thermite_World_Trade_Center.pdf

Have you even read it?

Can you find me a counter-thesis, a direct respons to that thesis
which rejects it in detail beyond a cursory "I don't agree"?

Don't you find it interesting that this thesis which is held up by 90%
of the Truth Movement as the smoking gun that WTC7 was controlled
demolition has had no formal or professional response from defenders
of the Official story? That the academic world remains silent?

And yet Jones' career has published over 50 academic papers in
esteemed journals.

I don't recall Feynman ever advocating nutcase positions.

You havn't even demonstrated as much and already you're on an ad
hominem assassination?

Are you lying and misrepresenting this issue deliberately?

I love how folks like you ask for intellectual honesty when every
effort is made to ignore evidence that doesn't agree with your
presupposed findings.

Which evidence would that be? Please cite twhich evidence contradicts
the controlled demolition hypothesis of WTC7 posited in this paper:
http://www.journalof911studies.com/...ollapse_Jones_Thermite_World_Trade_Center.pdf
 
W

War Office

Sometimes, when I pee into the toilet, a few droplets rise to heights that
defy god's laws. Do I have magic urine?

Was it recorded on video by three different television netoworks? How
can we believe you when you have no evidence other than your own
testimony to go by?
How do you know that you're not mistaken?

Have you tested this inquiry scientifically? Is there any way that an
independent investigation could repeat and varify the experiemental
results you are claiming to have observed?

Have you written this down in a careful academically structured thesis
such as this one:
http://www.journalof911studies.com/...ollapse_Jones_Thermite_World_Trade_Center.pdf
 
W

War Office

The same reason they listen to the even loonier Rosie O'donell?

http://www.popularmechanics.com/blogs/911myths/4213805.html


That is not a scientific paper. It makes unsubstantiated claims and
asks the reader to trust their advice that they have inquired with
'experts'.

Please compare that popular mechanics article of unsubstantiated
claims with this
varifiable substantiated and falsifiable theis by Professor Steven
Jones:
http://www.journalof911studies.com/...ollapse_Jones_Thermite_World_Trade_Center.pdf

It would be great if PM were willing to take on a critique of Jones'
thesis and I want to add that it is no suprise that they refuse.
Notice that they don't even mention Jones' in the article? And yet
Jones is the most famous 9/11 controlled demolition theory academic
second only perhaps to David Ray Griffin.

If PM really intended to dispel the 'myth' that Rosie espoused then
would they go for the heart of it?, namely:
http://www.journalof911studies.com/...ollapse_Jones_Thermite_World_Trade_Center.pdf
 
W

War Office

The same reason they listen to the even loonier Rosie O'donell?

http://www.popularmechanics.com/blogs/911myths/4213805.html


That is not a scientific paper. It makes unsubstantiated claims and
asks the reader to trust their advice that they have inquired with
'experts'.

Please compare that Popular Mechanics article of unsubstantiated
claims with this
varifiable substantiated and falsifiable thesis by Professor Steven
Jones:
http://www.journalof911studies.com/...ollapse_Jones_Thermite_World_Trade_Center.pdf

It would be great if PM were willing to take on a critique of Jones'
thesis and I want to add that it is no suprise that they neglected to.
Notice that they don't even mention StevenJones in the article? And
yet Jones is the most famous 9/11 controlled demolition theory
academic second only perhaps to David Ray Griffin.

If PM really intended to dispel the 'myth' that Rosie espoused then
wouldn't they go for the heart of it?, namely:
http://www.journalof911studies.com/...ollapse_Jones_Thermite_World_Trade_Center.pdf
 
W

War Office

"INN World Report interviewed Dr. Crockett Grabbe - professor of
physics at the University of Iowa - regarding his thoughts on the
'collapses' of WTC1, WTC2, & WTC7. In this interview he lists numerous
reasons to suspect controlled demolition and expresses support for
alternative theories."

A common mistake - I frequently confuse CalTech and U of Iowa.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&client=firefox-a...

That's interesting, no publications on any engineering topic.

None the less a phyics professor and able to write academic thesis as
proven in his physics publications:
http://www.physics.uiowa.edu/~cgrabbe/writing/research.html

Further from your insult, NIST refuse to give out any of the critical
specifications; such as blueprints and Protec photograph and video of
the debris field. So even if he was Professor of Engineering he would
not be able to comment as a Professional Engineer becuase he wouldn't
have access to the necessary information. Yes thats right, Guliani
order the expediant clean up of WTC7 and none of the assigned forensic
engineers even got to analyse the debris as per normal due process.
Don't believe me? Why don't you see the forensic engineers themselves
testify in this History Channel piece on WTC7:
 
M

Major Quaternion Dirt Quantum

here's a question that came-up recently,
in battling with the controlled-demo advocates
at teh Promenade:

how is it that the metal was still molten,
after weeks?

it seems taht an additional hypothesis is required,
to explain that. because I doubt that
there was sufficient nukular material
"left-over" from a hypothetical suitcase-device.

there are similar question,
from what I recall of Jones' report
(I just stopped at the first thing
that seemed funny, today .-)

publications:http://www.physics.uiowa.edu/~cgrabbe/writing/
research.html

thus:
this was basically assuming that
floor 50 of a 100-floor building started the collapse?...
interesting analysis; I hope to look at it, again, later.

have you seen the old analysis by the MIT Head Welder,
that I only saw a couple of weeks ago?
At time t=0, the top 50 floors begin to fall, independently of each
other. The first actual impact is when floor 50 hits floor 49. On
impact, those 2 floors fall together with an initial velocity that is
less than that of higher floors due to conservation of momentum. Thus
the next impact will not be floors 50,49 with floor 48 but rather it
will be floor 51 hitting the slower moving 50,49 combo. The 3 floors
51,50,49 then become a unit. The initial velocity of the new 51,50,49
combo will be greater than the velocity of the 50-49 combo just before
impact, but still less than that of the floors above (which are still
in free fall).

http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/plates/figs/plate01.html

thus:
"Global Warning,"
an *anonymous* article in an old issue of *National Review*,
the so-called conservative mag of the grotesque Establishment
creature,
William Buckley, was a sort of benignly-spun expose
of the Mont Pelerin Society, the vehicle of British imperialist "free
trade,"
free beer & free dumb, whose many "rightwing" affiliate foundations
are always in the news. the universally-newspaper-lauded-when-
he-died founding president, Mitlon Friedman,
used Sir Henry of Kiss.Ass. to conduct their first experiment
in Chile, with the help of Augusto Pinochet & Dick Nixon.

(the fact that it was an awful failure, with the privatization
of Chile's social security, was only recently mention, but
only before Uncly Milty died.)

I realized, much later, since it was anonymous, that
it was probably taken from The Holy Spook Economist, but
I haven't checked that hypothesis.

yes, "Warning" was meant to evoke "warming," although
nowhere mentioned in the article, as I recall; can you say,
"emmissions trading schemes," Boys and Girl?...
can you say, "hedge funds on out-of-the-way desert islands?..."
Just Desserts Island?

thus:
why do Dick, Borat, Osama, Harry P., Rumsfeld and Tony B. want us
to underwrite the 3rd British Invasion of Sudan,
so badly?

anyway, Bertrand Russel published a jeremyad in the Bulletin
of the Atomic Scientists, while the USA was the only thermonukey
power,
that we should bomb them into the Stone Age;
that's your British "pacifist," whether before or after he went nuts
because of Godel's proof.

thus:
if you can't prove that all Fermat numbers are pairwise coprime,
again!

Darfur 'Mini-Summit'
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/1998/rice_2546.html

thus:
uh yeah; Borat wants you in Sudan,
why, Baby?... Harry Potter wants you in Iran --
yeah, Baby; shag'US with a spoon?

--DARFURIA CONSISTS OF ARABs & nonARABs; NEWS-ITEM:
we are marching to Darfuria, Darfuria, Darfuria!
Harry Potter IIX, ?Ordeal @ Oxford//Sudan ^ Aircraft Carrier!
http://larouchepub.com/other/2007/3410caymans_hedges.html
ALgoreTHEmovieFORpresident.COM:
http://larouchepub.com/eirtoc/site_packages/2007/al_gore.html
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
473,769
Messages
2,569,576
Members
45,054
Latest member
LucyCarper

Latest Threads

Top