A
alexandre.braganti
Perhaps the function being called is _not_ the one that is overridden in the derived class due to the difference in the arguments or some such.
That's it.
Sorry for the waste of time, but there was a little difference between
my base function definition and the sub classe one. That's why there
was not really a polymorphism case.
All is clear now.
Many thanks to everybody that waste his time with my issue, especially
for Victor.
That's it.
Sorry for the waste of time, but there was a little difference between
my base function definition and the sub classe one. That's why there
was not really a polymorphism case.
All is clear now.
Many thanks to everybody that waste his time with my issue, especially
for Victor.