Why this stupid answer? I tried to find python in combination with wavelets,
both in the normal Google search engine and the Google groups search. Also
jpython/jython, etc. but non of the results was what I wanted to use. So,
that is why I posted it here. Think this is exacly the place to be...
Right, but the compulsively helpful probably went off duplicating your search,
which you could have prevented or gotten a better refinement from, instead of
this round of "oh, well in that case, ..."
Looked at wavelets.org, looked for Java implementations,etc.etc.
Btw, I once wrote a wavelets (de)composition in Delphi and C++Builder. And
fyi, I looked up the faq. So, I am not a novice at all in this field, but I
just need a version in Python which I couldn't find.
So how different do you think the response would have been if you had started
with this background info in your post?
So, please, think before you write such an answer. Not everybody is as
stupid as you think.
Look in the mirror and say that, but think in terms of social stuff ;-)
And please don't top-post (ok, it could have been worse, at least you didn't post HTML ;-)
And even then. If someone doesn't know the correct search keywords for use
in Google, this place is still the place to be. Right again. So,
So please be more kind to the next poster that (in you eyes) posts a stupid
question.
And you please be more kind to the compulsively helpful, so that they can
help you and others better, not waste their time on stuff you could easily
steer them away from by mentioning more context. Doing so also gives you
a chance to head off replies you might take as implying you're stupid, if
you're prone to reading things that way ;-)
</previously_top_posted>
BTW, if you find some python wavelet stuff, I'd be interested to see it too ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter