Web Studio and a Nomination

[Blinky the Shark]

Ouch.

I respectfully submit this site for at least an Honorable Mention in
this week's Worst Website competition.

http://www.collectnobel.com/heroines.html

<META NAME="generator" CONTENT="Web Studio, Version 4.0 for Windows">

Wasn't someone very recently touting Web Studio, in here? (May have
been in one of the other similar newsgroups.)

Looks substantially the same in Firefox, Opera and Konqueror.
Scrolling down provides no relief -- even the straight textual content
is hosed.

 

[BOOGIEMAN]

Looks substantially the same in Firefox, Opera and Konqueror.
Scrolling down provides no relief -- even the straight textual content
is hosed.

Looks same in the IE 6 too, this must be work of 4 year old kid.

 

[Blinky the Shark]

On 16 Mar 2005 22:34:29 GMT, Blinky the Shark wrote:

Looks same in the IE 6 too, this must be work of 4 year old kid.

Ow. Wonder what it *was* written for.

 

[Mark Parnell]

Ow. Wonder what it *was* written for.

Probably WebTV.

 

[Blinky the Shark]

Probably WebTV.

Well, *there's* something with which I shan't be viewing it.

 

[hyweljenkins]

Ouch.

I respectfully submit this site for at least an Honorable Mention in
this week's Worst Website competition.

http://www.collectnobel.com/heroines.html

<META NAME="generator" CONTENT="Web Studio, Version 4.0 for Windows">

What's the relevance of that? There are plenty of sites as bad, if not
worse, that this one written with DreamWeaver, FrontPage, Notepad,
Ultraedit, First Page 2000, HTML-Kit, ...

 

[Andy Dingley]

There are plenty of sites as bad, if not worse

I've not seen one that was broken in that particular and rather
obscure way though. It suggests that this is something WebStudio might
be prone to.