dorayme said:
What is your point in saying this? I do not disagree with this
last. But so what?
After deep self examination
I have to apologise. There was a
subtext to my post and I should have made it explicit. Every time some
computer gurus get together they tend to decide that their craft is
too complicated for the ordinary user to grasp and they should
interpose themselves. How can COBOL generate the efficient code that I
can write in assembler? How can Dreamweaver generate the superb HTML
that I can write using Notepad? If each employee has their own
computer the sky will fall in; how can we make their computer look
like a dumb terminal and control everything on the server?
What trap have I fallen into as a result?
Perhaps you will explain. But if you do, please note that it is
relevant to the point of my story that a program such as you
mention must not be so hard to make and maintain that it is more
costly and unwieldly on the whole in all its ramifications than
having the website manager receive the emails and immediately vet
the changes proposed, put them in unchanged, or adapt them with
an eye on the overall effect on the website design, if necessary
query the sender over glaring or other mistakes or other unhappy
proposed changes. The point of the story is that a lot of
managers in bureaucracies like the idea of CMS but it is often a
utopian idea, not as practical as it seems.
If the web site manager needs to do all that then you are right.
However, it is likely that these duties will go the way of the
telephone switchboard operator and the typist. The volume of web based
data will require that users can update the content and will result in
more products like Adobe Contribute
<
http://www.adobe.com/products/contribute/> and more web sites that
simply serve documents written with the contributors' favourite
editor.
Sorry, I can't see this? How does it make the first para
literally false?
It does not. I hope that this post explains where I was coming from
and fills in the details that should have been in my first response.