what is this script??

Discussion in 'HTML' started by Lloyd, Jan 2, 2005.

  1. Lloyd

    Lloyd Guest

    I found this script at the bottom of a page source code, what is it?

    <script
    language="javascript">eval(unescape('%76%61%72%20%73%3D%27%61%6D%6C%69%6F%74%70%3A%62%75%69%6C%2E%63%66%61%61%66%72%69%40%73%70%61%2E%61%72%6F%67%27%3B%76%61%72%20%7A%3D%27%27%3B%66%6F%72%28%76%61%72%20%69%3D%30%3B%69%3C%73%2E%6C%65%6E%67%74%68%3B%69%2B%2B%2C%69%2B%2B%29%7B%7A%3D%7A%2B%73%2E%73%75%62%73%74%72%69%6E%67%28%69%2B%31%2C%69%2B%32%29%2B%73%2E%73%75%62%73%74%72%69%6E%67%28%69%2C%69%2B%31%29%7D%64%6F%63%75%6D%65%6E%74%2E%77%72%69%74%65%28%27%3C%61%20%68%72%65%66%3D%22%27%2B%7A%2B%27%22%3E%27%29%3B'))</script>
     
    Lloyd, Jan 2, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. In article <aoYBd.741408$mD.77341@attbi_s02>, says...
    > I found this script at the bottom of a page source code, what is it?
    >
    > <script
    > language="javascript">eval(unescape('%76%61%72%20%73%3D%27%61%6D%6C%69%6F%74%70%3A%62%75%69%6C%2E%63%66%61%61%66%72%69%40%73%70%61%2E%61%72%6F%67%27%3B%76%61%72%20%7A%3D%27%27%3B%66%6F%72%28%76%61%72%20%69%3D%30%3B%69%3C%73%2E%6C%65%6E%67%74%68%3B%69%2B%2B%2C%69%2B%2B%29%7B%7A%3D%7A%2B%73%2E%73%75%62%73%74%72%69%6E%67%28%69%2B%31%2C%69%2B%32%29%2B%73%2E%73%75%62%73%74%72%69%6E%67%28%69%2C%69%2B%31%29%7D%64%6F%63%75%6D%65%6E%74%2E%77%72%69%74%65%28%27%3C%61%20%68%72%65%

    66%3D%22%27%2B%7A%2B%27%22%3E%27%29%3B'))</script>

    Change the "eval" to "document.write" and paste it all in to a blank
    HTML document to find out.

    --
    Hywel http://kibo.org.uk/
    I do not eat quiche.
     
    Hywel Jenkins, Jan 2, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertising

  3. Lloyd

    Oli Filth Guest

    Lloyd wrote:
    > I found this script at the bottom of a page source code, what is it?
    >
    > <script
    > language="javascript">eval(unescape('%76%61%72%20%73%3D%27%61%6D%6C%69%6F%74%70%3A%62%75%69%6C%2E%63%66%61%61%66%72%69%40%73%70%61%2E%61%72%6F%67%27%3B%76%61%72%20%7A%3D%27%27%3B%66%6F%72%28%76%61%72%20%69%3D%30%3B%69%3C%73%2E%6C%65%6E%67%74%68%3B%69%2B%2B%2C%69%2B%2B%29%7B%7A%3D%7A%2B%73%2E%73%75%62%73%74%72%69%6E%67%28%69%2B%31%2C%69%2B%32%29%2B%73%2E%73%75%62%73%74%72%69%6E%67%28%69%2C%69%2B%31%29%7D%64%6F%63%75%6D%65%6E%74%2E%77%72%69%74%65%28%27%3C%61%20%68%72%65%66%3D%22%27%2B%7A%2B%27%22%3E%27%29%3B'))</script>
    >
    >


    A dirty obfuscated piece of code which writes the following to the HTML
    document:

    <a href="mailto:p">

    How clever.
     
    Oli Filth, Jan 2, 2005
    #3
  4. Lloyd

    Lloyd Guest

    >> <script
    >> language="javascript">eval(unescape('%76%61%72%20%73%3D%27%61%6D%6C%69%6F%74%70%3A%62%75%69%6C%2E%63%66%61%61%66%72%69%40%73%70%61%2E%61%72%6F%67%27%3B%76%61%72%20%7A%3D%27%27%3B%66%6F%72%28%76%61%72%20%69%3D%30%3B%69%3C%73%2E%6C%65%6E%67%74%68%3B%69%2B%2B%2C%69%2B%2B%29%7B%7A%3D%7A%2B%73%2E%73%75%62%73%74%72%69%6E%67%28%69%2B%31%2C%69%2B%32%29%2B%73%2E%73%75%62%73%74%72%69%6E%67%28%69%2C%69%2B%31%29%7D%64%6F%63%75%6D%65%6E%74%2E%77%72%69%74%65%28%27%3C%61%20%68%72%65%66%3D%22%27%2B%7A%2B%27%22%3E%27%29%3B'))</script>

    > A dirty obfuscated piece of code which writes the following to the HTML
    > document:
    > <a href="mailto:p">
    >
    > How clever.


    Is that to fend off SPAM harvesting?
     
    Lloyd, Jan 2, 2005
    #4
  5. In article <M5ZBd.741582$mD.536729@attbi_s02>, says...
    > >> <script
    > >> language="javascript">eval(unescape('%76%61%72%20%73%3D%27%61%6D%6C%69%6F%74%70%3A%62%75%69%6C%2E%63%66%61%61%66%72%69%40%73%70%61%2E%61%72%6F%67%27%3B%76%61%72%20%7A%3D%27%27%3B%66%6F%72%28%76%61%72%20%69%3D%30%3B%69%3C%73%2E%6C%65%6E%67%74%68%3B%69%2B%2B%2C%69%2B%2B%29%7B%7A%3D%7A%2B%73%2E%73%75%62%73%74%72%69%6E%67%28%69%2B%31%2C%69%2B%32%29%2B%73%2E%73%75%62%73%74%72%69%6E%67%28%69%2C%69%2B%31%29%7D%64%6F%63%75%6D%65%6E%74%2E%77%72%69%74%65%28%27%3C%61%20%68%72%

    65%66%3D%22%27%2B%7A%2B%27%22%3E%27%29%3B'))</script>
    > > A dirty obfuscated piece of code which writes the following to the HTML
    > > document:
    > > <a href="mailto:p">
    > >
    > > How clever.

    >
    > Is that to fend off SPAM harvesting?


    Probably. Email them and ask.

    --
    Hywel http://kibo.org.uk/
    I do not eat quiche.
     
    Hywel Jenkins, Jan 2, 2005
    #5
  6. Lloyd

    SpaceGirl Guest

    Oli Filth wrote:
    > Lloyd wrote:
    >
    >> I found this script at the bottom of a page source code, what is it?
    >>
    >> <script
    >> language="javascript">eval(unescape('%76%61%72%20%73%3D%27%61%6D%6C%69%6F%74%70%3A%62%75%69%6C%2E%63%66%61%61%66%72%69%40%73%70%61%2E%61%72%6F%67%27%3B%76%61%72%20%7A%3D%27%27%3B%66%6F%72%28%76%61%72%20%69%3D%30%3B%69%3C%73%2E%6C%65%6E%67%74%68%3B%69%2B%2B%2C%69%2B%2B%29%7B%7A%3D%7A%2B%73%2E%73%75%62%73%74%72%69%6E%67%28%69%2B%31%2C%69%2B%32%29%2B%73%2E%73%75%62%73%74%72%69%6E%67%28%69%2C%69%2B%31%29%7D%64%6F%63%75%6D%65%6E%74%2E%77%72%69%74%65%28%27%3C%61%20%68%72%65%66%3D%22%27%2B%7A%2B%27%22%3E%27%29%3B'))</script>
    >>
    >>

    >
    > A dirty obfuscated piece of code which writes the following to the HTML
    > document:
    >
    > <a href="mailto:p">
    >
    > How clever.


    heh. at least it was, until you posted it in usenet, which is one of the
    fave hunting grounds of spambots :)

    --


    x theSpaceGirl (miranda)

    # lead designer @ http://www.dhnewmedia.com #
    # remove NO SPAM to email, or use form on website #
     
    SpaceGirl, Jan 2, 2005
    #6
  7. Lloyd

    Lloyd Guest

    >> Is that to fend off SPAM harvesting?
    >
    > Probably. Email them and ask.
    >

    All they had to do was encode a couple letters to throw off a spam spider.
    I DO eat quiche!
     
    Lloyd, Jan 2, 2005
    #7
  8. "Hywel Jenkins" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > In article <M5ZBd.741582$mD.536729@attbi_s02>, says...
    > > >> <script
    > > >>

    language="javascript">eval(unescape('%76%61%72%20%73%3D%27%61%6D%6C%69%6F%74
    %70%3A%62%75%69%6C%2E%63%66%61%61%66%72%69%40%73%70%61%2E%61%72%6F%67%27%3B%
    76%61%72%20%7A%3D%27%27%3B%66%6F%72%28%76%61%72%20%69%3D%30%3B%69%3C%73%2E%6
    C%65%6E%67%74%68%3B%69%2B%2B%2C%69%2B%2B%29%7B%7A%3D%7A%2B%73%2E%73%75%62%73
    %74%72%69%6E%67%28%69%2B%31%2C%69%2B%32%29%2B%73%2E%73%75%62%73%74%72%69%6E%
    67%28%69%2C%69%2B%31%29%7D%64%6F%63%75%6D%65%6E%74%2E%77%72%69%74%65%28%27%3
    C%61%20%68%72%
    > 65%66%3D%22%27%2B%7A%2B%27%22%3E%27%29%3B'))</script>
    > > > A dirty obfuscated piece of code which writes the following to the

    HTML
    > > > document:
    > > > <a href="mailto:p">
    > > >
    > > > How clever.

    > >
    > > Is that to fend off SPAM harvesting?

    >
    > Probably. Email them and ask.


    But encode your email address like the above
    3D%30%3B%69%3C%73%2E%6C%65%6E... just to annoy them :)
     
    Rocket Scientist, Jan 2, 2005
    #8
  9. Lloyd

    Lloyd Guest

    > heh. at least it was, until you posted it in usenet, which is one of the
    > fave hunting grounds of spambots :)
    >

    OOPS! haha
    This guy has a trick to trap psammers
    http://www.megspace.com/family/kenvir/spampage1.html
    100 random fake emails that sends spammer thru a loop.
     
    Lloyd, Jan 2, 2005
    #9
  10. "Lloyd" <> schreef in bericht
    news:HFZBd.319991$HA.288043@attbi_s01...
    > >> Is that to fend off SPAM harvesting?

    > >
    > > Probably. Email them and ask.
    > >

    > All they had to do was encode a couple letters to throw off a spam spider.
    > I DO eat quiche!
    >
    >


    Quiche seems to be some type of food,
    have seen it printed plenty of times at alt.html before.
    But *what is* quiche?

    Regards,
    Samuël
     
    Samuël van Laere, Jan 3, 2005
    #10
  11. Lloyd

    rf Guest

    "Samuël van Laere" <> wrote

    > Quiche seems to be some type of food,
    > have seen it printed plenty of times at alt.html before.
    > But *what is* quiche?


    Quiche is almost inedible.

    Egg and bacon pie is, however, quite nice, especially with a bit if spinach
    added.

    --
    Cheers
    Richard.
     
    rf, Jan 3, 2005
    #11
  12. In article <IH0Cd.253416$>, Samuël van
    Laere () dropped a +5 bundle of words...

    > "Lloyd" <> schreef in bericht
    > news:HFZBd.319991$HA.288043@attbi_s01...
    > > >> Is that to fend off SPAM harvesting?
    > > >
    > > > Probably. Email them and ask.
    > > >

    > > All they had to do was encode a couple letters to throw off a spam spider.
    > > I DO eat quiche!
    > >
    > >

    >
    > Quiche seems to be some type of food,
    > have seen it printed plenty of times at alt.html before.
    > But *what is* quiche?


    It's an egg dish. It's pretty gross.


    --
    Starshine Moonbeam
    mhm31x9 Smeeter#29 WSD#30
    sTaRShInE_mOOnBeAm aT HoTmAil dOt CoM
     
    Starshine Moonbeam, Jan 3, 2005
    #12
  13. Lloyd

    Toby Inkster Guest

    Toby Inkster, Jan 3, 2005
    #13
  14. Lloyd

    Toby Inkster Guest

    Toby Inkster, Jan 3, 2005
    #14
  15. Lloyd

    paul Guest

    Toby Inkster wrote:
    > Starshine Moonbeam wrote:
    >
    >
    >>It's an egg dish. It's pretty gross.

    >
    >
    > Pah! No it's not. It's lovely.
    >
    > http://tobyinkster.co.uk/food-france#quiche



    With Swiss cheese, lots of spinach & mushrooms (dry sauted). Mmmmm & I
    usually hate plain eggs.
     
    paul, Jan 3, 2005
    #15
  16. Lloyd

    mbstevens Guest

    paul wrote:

    > Toby Inkster wrote:
    >> Starshine Moonbeam wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>>It's an egg dish. It's pretty gross.

    >>
    >>
    >> Pah! No it's not. It's lovely.
    >>
    >> http://tobyinkster.co.uk/food-france#quiche

    >
    >
    > With Swiss cheese, lots of spinach & mushrooms (dry sauted). Mmmmm & I
    > usually hate plain eggs.


    What, no jalapeños??
     
    mbstevens, Jan 3, 2005
    #16
  17. Lloyd

    Lloyd Guest

    Lloyd, Jan 3, 2005
    #17
  18. In article <>, Toby
    Inkster () dropped a +5 bundle of words...

    > Starshine Moonbeam wrote:
    >
    > > It's an egg dish. It's pretty gross.

    >
    > Pah! No it's not. It's lovely.


    Can't stand it. Momma Moonbeam used to make ponsit too, which was even
    worse than quiche.

    >
    > http://tobyinkster.co.uk/food-france#quiche
    >



    --
    Starshine Moonbeam
    mhm31x9 Smeeter#29 WSD#30
    sTaRShInE_mOOnBeAm aT HoTmAil dOt CoM
     
    Starshine Moonbeam, Jan 3, 2005
    #18
  19. On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 15:03:25 -0600, Starshine Moonbeam wrote:

    > Can't stand it. Momma Moonbeam used to make ponsit too, which was even
    > worse than quiche.


    What is so bad about quiche? You must've had really bad quiche.

    a good quiche is light and custardy, and has fresh additional ingredients
    like ham, bacon, spinach, or other vegetables. yummmmm

    --
    Jeffrey D. Silverman |
    Website | http://www.newtnotes.com

    Drop "PANTS" to reply by email
     
    Jeffrey Silverman, Jan 3, 2005
    #19
  20. In article <>, Jeffrey
    Silverman () dropped a +5 bundle of words...

    > On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 15:03:25 -0600, Starshine Moonbeam wrote:
    >
    > > Can't stand it. Momma Moonbeam used to make ponsit too, which was even
    > > worse than quiche.

    >
    > What is so bad about quiche? You must've had really bad quiche.


    It's been so long since I had it, I couldn't even tell you anymore. You
    mentioned something about the texture. I remember I didn't like my eggs
    light and custardy. That and MM threw in about a zillion things that
    just didn't work together. I'm a really picky eater anyway so there's
    lots of things I don't like.

    >
    > a good quiche is light and custardy, and has fresh additional ingredients
    > like ham, bacon, spinach, or other vegetables. yummmmm
    >
    >


    --
    Starshine Moonbeam
    mhm31x9 Smeeter#29 WSD#30
    sTaRShInE_mOOnBeAm aT HoTmAil dOt CoM
     
    Starshine Moonbeam, Jan 4, 2005
    #20
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Wet Basement
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    2,536
    BobMonk
    Jul 15, 2003
  2. dpackwood
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    1,824
  3. P McGinness
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    299
    P McGinness
    Jan 14, 2004
  4. Rajat
    Replies:
    3
    Views:
    712
    Jorgen Grahn
    Jan 8, 2010
  5. VYAS ASHISH M-NTB837
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    573
    Jan Kaliszewski
    Jan 7, 2010
Loading...

Share This Page