what is wrong with all that authors?

[cody]

Yesterday i was in the bookshop to buy a book. just for interest i leafed
through
some C++ books. It is unbelievable but the C++ book-authors are as stupid as
they
was 10 years ago. They still pretend that main returns void and <iostream.h>
is the correct header for io operations. What is wrong with them?

 

[E. Robert Tisdale]

Yesterday i was in the bookshop to buy a book.
just for interest i leafed through some C++ books.
It is unbelievable but the C++ book-authors
are as stupid as they was 10 years ago.
They still pretend that main returns void and <iostream.h>
is the correct header for io operations. What is wrong with them?

I don't know.
You'd think that they could, at least, learn to spell,
use complete sentences and learn to use English grammar properly,

Try "The C++ Programming Language Language: Third Edition"
by Bjarne Stroustrup.

 

[jeffc]

Yesterday i was in the bookshop to buy a book. just for interest i leafed
through
some C++ books. It is unbelievable but the C++ book-authors are as stupid as
they was...

nyuk nyuk

 

[cppaddict]

I don't know.

You'd think that they could, at least, learn to spell,
use complete sentences and learn to use English grammar properly,

Robert,

That is some funny stuff. You had me laughing out loud.

cpp

 

[David Rubin]

Yesterday i was in the bookshop to buy a book. just for interest i leafed
through
some C++ books. It is unbelievable but the C++ book-authors are as stupid as
they
was 10 years ago. They still pretend that main returns void and <iostream.h>
is the correct header for io operations. What is wrong with them?

It's not the authors' fault. It's the editors'.

/david