-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
Do I really have to test everything on all possible architectures before
I can take a guess at the cause of a problem?
No, of course that's unreasonable. I think Jeff's point is that you
shouldn't accuse someone of not using the code he's posted unless you're
*sure* it couldn't produce the posted output. (e.g., an error like
$my=; shouldn't parse on any platform) You could even phrase it more
like a question: "Are you *sure* that's the code you're running? Here's
what I get...."
Some might contend that, while we shouldn't have to know every nuance
of every platform, popular problems like a case-insensitive filesystem
should be considered when reading about a problem you can't reproduce.
Obviously this is a grey area of problem-solving.
--keith
--
(e-mail address removed)-francisco.ca.us
(try just my userid to email me)
AOLSFAQ=
http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/cgi-bin/fom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see
http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAj9wdXAACgkQhVcNCxZ5ID+HfACeKg6wDHMBT/kHVXjIHxI9H09C
mycAn0E773O5E1JL59x357FQ6MsgV20A
=8ZJq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----