Thomas Tutone said:
(You really should get yourself a good C++ book, by
the way.)
Uhm possible ... though I'll rather concentrate on the standard library
and the likes if I have the choice ...
You lost me there. What do you mean by the "standard library"? The
"standard template library" [STL]? The STL is a set of templates,
written
in C++. If you're referring to the C++ run-time library, then you're
talking about a given compiler vendor's implementation of the C++
language
features (such as I/O, basic math functions, etc.). Perhaps you're
talking
about some on-line Help system in your compiler's IDE?
Have you really not heard of the C++ standard library? If not, perhaps
you need to follow your own good advice and get yourself a good book as
well. I highly recommend Josuttis' The C++ Standard Library. Or
perhaps I misunderstood you (I seem to do that at times).
I see your point. My book (The C++ Programming Language", Stroustrup),
refers to the "standard library", but it's kind of talking about everything
in the C++ language, including the STL. (In fact, in answering his own
question: "what should be in the standard library?", he answers:
"everything!".) So really, saying the "standard library" doesn't mean all
that much, does it? Mostly people talk about the STL, otherwise they're
really just talking about the language as a whole, right?
And anyway, my point was really: what about using the "standard library"
negates needing a book to study it? The OP was saying he'd "rather
concentrate on the standard library..." when I suggested getting a C++ book,
as if one precluded the other. That statement is really what made no sense
to me.
-Howard