D
Djuro.Tost
Thanks in advance...
Robert...
Robert...
Thanks in advance...
Robert...
Further questions about these compilers would be better directed to a
forum specific to them. See the respective web pages for pointers.
There exists a windows prejudice in clc. Such parochialism has nothing to
do with the C programming Language.
Richard Nixon said:[reordered, for thematic reasons]Further questions about these compilers would be better directed to a
forum specific to them. See the respective web pages for pointers.
I respect your opinion, but mine differs.
I've got a brand new xp install
and have both of the below installed. I would like to get the following
pseudocode to work on both, and I hope to run them simultaneously.
#include <time.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void)
time_t num1, num2, num_3;
int input, diff;
print *, "enter a number to make timer start"
read *, input
num1 = gettime()
print *, "time is ticking"
print *, "replying to this will stop the clock"
read *, input
num2 = gettime()
num3 = num2 - num1
// cast the result to a type you know how to print
diff = cast num3
printf %d "seconds elapsed were " \n, diff;
There exists a windows prejudice in clc. Such parochialism has nothing to
do with the C programming Language.
[email protected] said:Thanks in advance...
Robert...
Richard Nixon wrote:
....
A disproportionate number of the people who post messages here in the
mistaken belief that implementation-specific messages are on-topic
here seem to be Windows users. However, I don't think that indicates a
prejudice in favor of Windows. It just reflects the demographic fact
that a disproportionate fraction of the people who are familiar with
programming on only one type of platform are Windows programmers. More
C programming is done on non-Windows platforms, but most of it is done
by people who are also familiar with the existence of Windows programs.
[...]Richard Nixon said:They will usually equate *any* talk of how a person gets on with either
host or target OS to be like talk of women's lib among sandni**ers:
anathema.
[...]Richard Nixon said:They will usually equate *any* talk of how a person gets on with either
host or target OS to be like talk of women's lib among sandniggers:
anathema.
Please keep your racist crap out of this newsgroup (or any other).
A disproportionate number of the anti-windows zealots provide a
dispropprtionately large fraction of the serious assholes in this world.
They will usually equate *any* talk of how a person gets on with either
host or target OS to be like talk of women's lib among sandniggers:
anathema.
If K&R are the Holy Tablets, then one eighth of the time would be about
right. Maybe we should K †R , but not seven.
[...]Richard Nixon said:They will usually equate *any* talk of how a person gets on with either
host or target OS to be like talk of women's lib among sandni**ers:
anathema.
Please keep your racist crap out of this newsgroup (or any other).
Richard said:[...]Richard Nixon said:They will usually equate *any* talk of how a person gets on with either
host or target OS to be like talk of women's lib among sandni**ers:
anathema.
Please keep your racist crap out of this newsgroup (or any other).
It takes someone the size of Keith Thompson to think that gurth is
sufficient so that his editorial prerogatives applies to places where he's
a joke.
How many "brownies" has your government killed?
Are you the ayatollah?
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.