Which is better or more flexible, a recursive-descent parser or abottom-up parser?

Discussion in 'C++' started by Robert, Apr 14, 2008.

  1. Robert

    Robert Guest

    especially if the grammar is non-standard.
     
    Robert, Apr 14, 2008
    #1
    1. Advertising

  2. Robert

    Puppet_Sock Guest

    On Apr 14, 2:10 pm, Robert <> wrote:
    > especially if the grammar is non-standard.


    You probably want to be asking that in a group where they
    talk about algorithms and solution methods and such. It
    sounds like it is probably not strongly coupled to the
    language you implement it in.
    Socks
     
    Puppet_Sock, Apr 14, 2008
    #2
    1. Advertising

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Phlip
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    477
    Phlip
    Aug 2, 2004
  2. Phlip
    Replies:
    6
    Views:
    452
    Phlip
    Aug 5, 2004
  3. Phlip
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    464
    Phlip
    Aug 2, 2004
  4. Replies:
    4
    Views:
    471
    Ben Sizer
    Oct 2, 2006
  5. Just Another Victim of the Ambient Morality

    Is pyparsing really a recursive descent parser?

    Just Another Victim of the Ambient Morality, Nov 2, 2007, in forum: Python
    Replies:
    39
    Views:
    1,449
    Kay Schluehr
    Nov 9, 2007
Loading...

Share This Page