Which is the proper header to include for std::pair?

[Eric Lilja]

As the subject says, which is the proper header to include for the type
std:air? In my program I have a std::vector of std:air<std::string,
std::string> and on my compiler including <vector> and <string> also gives
me access to std:air. I just want to know so I don't have to muck about
with the includes when porting to a different compiler.

/ Eric

 

[Matthias Kaeppler]

As the subject says, which is the proper header to include for the type
std:air? In my program I have a std::vector of std:air<std::string,
std::string> and on my compiler including <vector> and <string> also gives
me access to std:air. I just want to know so I don't have to muck about
with the includes when porting to a different compiler.

/ Eric

This is almost certainly implementation specific. I didn't find any
words in the standard where std:air has to be defined.
Better ask in the newsgroup specific for your STL platform.

 

[Pete Becker]

As the subject says, which is the proper header to include for the type
std:air? In my program I have a std::vector of std:air<std::string,
std::string> and on my compiler including <vector> and <string> also gives
me access to std:air. I just want to know so I don't have to muck about
with the includes when porting to a different compiler.

std:air is defined when you include <utility>.

 

[Victor Bazarov]

This is almost certainly implementation specific.
Not.

I didn't find any
words in the standard where std:air has to be defined.
Better ask in the newsgroup specific for your STL platform.

Eric, use <utility>

Matthias, get better glasses or something. 20.2.2.

V

 

[Matthias Kaeppler]

Eric, use <utility>

Matthias, get better glasses or something. 20.2.2.

V

Sorry.
This happens if you search for "pair" and fail to realize where you
landed (that is, in the "Utility components" section). My bad.
Maybe I should get better glasses afterall

 

[Eric Lilja]

std:air is defined when you include <utility>.

Thank you Pete and the others who replied to my inquiry. I will add an
#include <utility> statement in order to make my code as portable to other
implementations of the standard library as possible.

/ Eric