W
Wisgary
Would it be fair to say that it is javac?
Wisgary said:Would it be fair to say that it is javac?
Alan said:For IBM's JDK, the compiler also called javac, just another
implementation. But if you are dealing with some IBM's products such
as Websphere or something, you must have the IBM's JDK(in some cases,
there is a special edition for Websphere) as your development base, as
there're some differences between IBM's and Sun's
Arne Vajhøj said:WAS requires IBM JDK to run.
But the code you write should hopefully compile
fine with a SUN javac.
Adam said:That's kind of creepy: WAS is only source-compatible, not
bytecode-compatible?
Alan said:Not exactly, it depends on which version of Sun JVM you used to
compile. IBM's WAS JDK only compatible with Sun JDK 1.4x. But in this
version also some constant are not exactly same with sun's. I can't
remember which constants, something relative to jar package schema.
WAS requires IBM JDK to run.
But the code you write should hopefully compile
fine with a SUN javac.
Arne
I was under the impression that WAS uses the IBM JDK on some platforms
and not on others. I think on Solaris WAS uses the SUN JDK.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.