S
somebody
I'm posting a new message regarding this subject,
since the one posted previously is getting rather
large. I just received the June 2005 issue of
Dr. Dobb's Journal, and it contains an article
titled "The Technical Report On C++ Library
Extensions". After debating this issue with
various group members, all I can say is:
I Win!!! (Just kidding)
Anyway, here are a couple of quotes from the article,
which reflect my sentiments exactly:
"The Perl, Python, and Java standard libraries include
facilities for parsing XML, performing regular
expression searches, manipulating image files, and
sending data over the network. From that perspective,
the C++ standard library looks like it's only the
beginning. And everyone in the standards committee knows
that of course."
"The question isn't whether we need a more comprehensive
library, but how we get one".
since the one posted previously is getting rather
large. I just received the June 2005 issue of
Dr. Dobb's Journal, and it contains an article
titled "The Technical Report On C++ Library
Extensions". After debating this issue with
various group members, all I can say is:
I Win!!! (Just kidding)
Anyway, here are a couple of quotes from the article,
which reflect my sentiments exactly:
"The Perl, Python, and Java standard libraries include
facilities for parsing XML, performing regular
expression searches, manipulating image files, and
sending data over the network. From that perspective,
the C++ standard library looks like it's only the
beginning. And everyone in the standards committee knows
that of course."
"The question isn't whether we need a more comprehensive
library, but how we get one".