Why Google is broken

P

Philip Ronan

In alt.html Big Bill said:


how about a quick paragraph summarizing the 10 pages?

blah blah blah ... DOOM! ... blah blah blah ... GLOOM! ... blah blah blah
.... BUY MY BOOK! ... blah blah blah

(Something like that anyway)
 
B

Big Bill

In alt.html Big Bill said:


how about a quick paragraph summarizing the 10 pages?

Google relies heavily in its algo on inbound links. New sites don't
get heard of as they don't have, not surprisingly, the same amount of
inbound links as old existing and well-established sites. If you do a
link campaign, adding a few links a week, the existing sites, given
the prominence they already have, will easily match that. So they
always stay up, and you always stay down.

BB

i tried and you rejected me:(

www.kruse.co.uk
SEO you could cuddle. Probably..
 
B

Big Bill

blah blah blah ... DOOM! ... blah blah blah ... GLOOM! ... blah blah blah
... BUY MY BOOK! ... blah blah blah

(Something like that anyway)

I didn't realise anyone here had read it.

BB
www.kruse.co.uk
SEO you could cuddle. Probably..
 
B

brucie

In alt.html Philip Ronan said:
blah blah blah ... DOOM! ... blah blah blah ... GLOOM! ... blah blah blah
... BUY MY BOOK! ... blah blah blah

what, no fire and brimstone?
 
P

Philip Ronan

Google relies heavily in its algo on inbound links. New sites don't
get heard of as they don't have, not surprisingly, the same amount of
inbound links as old existing and well-established sites. If you do a
link campaign, adding a few links a week, the existing sites, given
the prominence they already have, will easily match that. So they
always stay up, and you always stay down.

I have to say that is an overly pessimistic view of things.

Sure, as the web grows it's going to become harder to get noticed. That's
just the way things are. If I decided to go into the fast food industry, I'd
have to overcome stiff competition from the likes of McDonalds. If I wanted
to set up an online gambling website then I'd face equally stiff
competition. But there are too many gambling sites out there already. Who
cares if another one pops up?

In the majority of cases it's still perfectly possible to get a decent rank
in Google's results. It's hardly rocket science. All you have to do is:

1. Follow Google's guidelines:
<http://www.google.co.uk/webmasters/guidelines.html>

2. Produce something that people might actually find interesting or useful.

I don't know what your approach is, Bill, but it seems to me that most "SEO
experts" put all their effort into trying to run rings around Google, and
spend no time whatsoever trying to make websites more interesting or useful.

Phil
 
A

Andy Dingley

blah blah blah ... DOOM! ... blah blah blah ... GLOOM! ... blah blah blah
... BUY MY BOOK! ... blah blah blah

(Something like that anyway)

You forgot the twee granpappy story
 
J

Jim Higson

Big said:

I don't care enough to read the article, but I have noticed the quality of
google results declining recently, for example if google for information on
some bit of equipment or other, the results are swamped with price
comparison sites.

I suppose a lot of people would find these hits useful. In most cases though
I want an unbiased review, technical specs or something.

Same with blogs - why does google bring up blogs so often?
 
B

Big Bill

I don't care enough to read the article, but I have noticed the quality of
google results declining recently, for example if google for information on
some bit of equipment or other, the results are swamped with price
comparison sites.

They are pages on sites that lots of people link to. Already.
I suppose a lot of people would find these hits useful. In most cases though
I want an unbiased review, technical specs or something.

Same with blogs - why does google bring up blogs so often?

See above.

BB
www.kruse.co.uk
SEO you could cuddle. Probably..
 
T

Toby Inkster

Big said:
Google relies heavily in its algo on inbound links. New sites don't
get heard of as they don't have, not surprisingly, the same amount of
inbound links as old existing and well-established sites. If you do a
link campaign, adding a few links a week, the existing sites, given
the prominence they already have, will easily match that. So they
always stay up, and you always stay down.

Though Google does seem to reward the more current and up-to-date sites.

If they're more established *and* they're keeping up to date, maybe you
don't have a chance of beating them, but OTOH maybe then they *deserve* to
stay on top.
 
B

Big Bill

Though Google does seem to reward the more current and up-to-date sites.

A site which revises its content on a regular basis will get spidered
more often than those which, once published, stay static.
If they're more established *and* they're keeping up to date, maybe you
don't have a chance of beating them, but OTOH maybe then they *deserve* to
stay on top.

Makes it impossible to establish a new one.

BB
www.kruse.co.uk
SEO that's fun to read!
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
473,768
Messages
2,569,574
Members
45,048
Latest member
verona

Latest Threads

Top